Re: Moves in FSFS

2013-09-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.09.2013 17:21, Julian Foad wrote: > One issue that may be harder than it sounds at first is the concept of > 'node-line-id' rather than (node-id, copy-id) as the basis of the > definition. The point is that when we copy (ordinary copy, not move) > a directory, we lazy-copy the children, No

RE: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1

2013-09-11 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: dinsdag 10 september 2013 09:29 > To: Curt Sellmer > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: Error during 'svn export' over http with serf 1.3.1 > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Curt Sellmer > wrote: >

Re: Improving CHANGES (or at least making it easier to produce)

2013-09-11 Thread Ben Reser
On 9/1/13 2:42 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > That's not really an argument, because that's true whether you do it > at commit time or afterwards. You don't save any time (quite the > contrary) by postponing it until CHANGES needs to be produced, or > until the revision needs to be backported. Except

Re: Moves in FSFS

2013-09-11 Thread Julian Foad
Thanks, Stefan!  Very interesting thoughts.  Especially... (scroll down)... Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Julian Foad wrote: >>    http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MoveDev/MoveDev#Move_Semantics >>    http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MoveDev/MovesInFSFS >> [...] >> >>

Re: Moves in FSFS

2013-09-11 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > While discussions continue about the "editor" and the WC side of move > tracking, I'd like to make some progress on the Repository side. > > The Wiki page > > http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MoveDev/MoveDev#Move_Semantics > > declares the

Re: Moves in FSFS

2013-09-11 Thread Branko Čibej
On 11.09.2013 20:09, Julian Foad wrote: >> Proposal: Resurrect keeping the old node-line IDs, iff >> (a) the copy source (or a parent) got deleted in the next revision >> (b) no copies of that node (or any parent) were added since the source rev. >> That should keep normal copying relativel

Moves in FSFS

2013-09-11 Thread Julian Foad
While discussions continue about the "editor" and the WC side of move tracking, I'd like to make some progress on the Repository side. The Wiki page http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MoveDev/MoveDev#Move_Semantics declares the semantic model and http://wiki.apache.org/subversion/MoveDev