Greg Stein writes:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>...
>> again either invalid or switched. This implies that if we want to
>> combine
>
> They are already combined. One person is trying to *decombine* them
> into separate non-atomic unknown-duration actions.
Two peo
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that alter_dir on a directory
>> should occur before add or delete affects the children of the directory.
>> There is also a rule:
>>
>> * - The ancestor of an added, copi
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>...
> again either invalid or switched. This implies that if we want to
> combine
They are already combined. One person is trying to *decombine* them
into separate non-atomic unknown-duration actions.
>
> move_away A, id=1
> move_
Johan Corveleyn writes:
> I don't fully grok the Ev2 ideas and discussions, so not sure this is
> relevant, but please do remember this little detail: for working
> copies on case-insensitive filesystems, it's important that deletes
> are executed before adds (for handling case-only renames: 'svn
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Greg Stein writes:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>>...
>>> again either invalid or switched. This implies that if we want to
>>> combine
>>
>> They are already combined. One person is trying to *decombine* th
Philip Martin writes:
> What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that alter_dir on a directory
> should occur before add or delete affects the children of the directory.
> There is also a rule:
>
> * - The ancestor of an added, copied-here, moved-here, or
> * modified node may not be delete
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 6 september 2013 17:50
> To: Greg Stein
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Move using initial state
>
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 06.09.2013 17:50, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>...
>> I've been thinking about alter_dir and I see no reason, in the update
>> editor at least, for a rule that requires alter_dir before adding or
>> removing children. Th
On 06.09.2013 17:50, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> What about alter_dir? I think the rule is that alter_dir on a directory
>> should occur before add or delete affects the children of the directory.
>> There is also a rule:
>>
>> * - The ancestor of an added, copied-here, mov
"Bert Huijben" writes:
> Shouldn't alter_dir get the complete list of directories when children are
> added/removed?
Yes, I didn't mean to imply anything else. If alter_dir is called it
must get a complete list of children. However alter_dir doesn't have to
occur before children are added/delet
Philip Martin writes:
> This implies that if we want to
> combine
>
> move_away A, id=1
> move_here id=1, B
>
> into a single
>
> move A, B
>
> then move and alter need to be combined:
>
> move_dir A, B, children=, props=
> move_file A, B, checksum=, props=
I didn't mea
QXO writes:
> The bug found in svn 1.8.3(r1516576) again :(
>
> E:\svnmirror>D:\tools\svn-win32-1.8.3\bin\svnadmin.exe upgrade ZmccPrj
> 宸插彇寰楃増鏈簱閿佸畾銆?璇风◢鍊欙紱鍗囩骇鐗堟湰搴撳彲鑳介渶瑕佷竴娈垫椂闂?..
> 完成升级。
>
> E:\svnmirror>D:\tools\svn-win32-1.8.0\bin\svnadmin.exe upgrade ZmccPrj
> 已取得版本库锁定。
> 请稍候;升级版本库可能需要一段时间...
12 matches
Mail list logo