On 8/22/13 2:08 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.13 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on August
> 29th so please try and get your vot
On 8/22/13 3:10 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.3 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on August
> 29th so please try and get your vote
2013/8/25 Lieven Govaerts :
> Summarising our investigation:
> 1. The error that Johan receives is caused by the body of a 501 Method
> Not Implemented response (see [1]) being directly appended to a
> response to a GET request.
> 2. The request that triggered this response is this: DAV:
> http://s
Hello
Can you provide me with a link as to how to apply this patch? When I search
for applying a subversion patch all I get is stuff involving svn diff. I think
the patch may be safer than using --force with switch for which all the
ramifications I do not even know.
-Original Message---
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:33:04PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> Done in r1517478.
>
> Thanks. But the comment still doesn't explain _why_ GET headers
> do not need the extra DAV headers. Issue #3255 doesn't mention
> GET requests anywhere.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After two weeks now, I finally completed the fsfs format 6 refactoring
> and improvement work on said branch. Please review. See also
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2013-07/0385.shtml for the "s
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:33:04PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> Done in r1517478.
Thanks. But the comment still doesn't explain _why_ GET headers
do not need the extra DAV headers. Issue #3255 doesn't mention
GET requests anywhere.
Can we explain the reason in the comment so that readers of the
co
Done in r1517478.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:15:45AM -, i...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Mon Aug 26 09:15:44 2013
>> New Revision: 1517472
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1517472
>> Log:
>> ra_serf: Remove DAV: headers
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 09:15:45AM -, i...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Mon Aug 26 09:15:44 2013
> New Revision: 1517472
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1517472
> Log:
> ra_serf: Remove DAV: headers from GET requests. This decrease outbound
> traffic during checkout/update by 45%.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 03:44:05PM -0700, Travis Brown wrote:
> I took a brief look at the resolution code and found it to be a twisty
> maze of callbacks and workqueues. There didn't appear to be any existing
> infrastructure or obvious way to resolve the tree conflict on the
> directory and then
10 matches
Mail list logo
