On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:40 AM, wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Jul 3 14:40:21 2013
> New Revision: 1499423
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1499423
> Log:
> Fix busted-proxy detection: any 411 will be received without a
> Subversion error. Tested by tweaking the testsuite code to set
> bus
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:02:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
> + SVN_ERR(svn_config_get_user_config_path(&config_path,
> + opt_state->config_dir, NULL,
> + pool));
> + footer = _("Available authe
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 17:32:46 +0300:
> Are there features others would like to see in backport.pl that would
> make it useful for their workflows? For example, if I added a 'show log
> messages of these revisions' feature, or a 'Add my +1 to this
> nomination' feature,
I we
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013 15:26:16 +0200, Lieven Govaerts said:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Lieven Govaerts
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Ashish,
>>>
>>> This is normally a question for users@, but I think Lieven was working
>>> on somethi
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 08:05:43 -0700:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it
> > was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db.
>
> I'm less confident that this is a good
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> We could do the same in configure.ac: permit BDB 6 to go through if it
> was explicitly specified in the argument of --with-berkeley-db.
I'm less confident that this is a good solution for configure because
certain platforms peculiarities hav
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:28:56 -0700:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
> >> Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just
> >> add "60" if we test with it because we have no
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
> Sent: woensdag 3 juli 2013 13:38
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org; prabh...@apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1499315 - in /subversion/branches/verify-keep-
> going/subversion:
My workflow for reviewing backports is to run backport.pl with no
arguments. It shows me each entry and allows me to merge it (real
merge, not a dry-run) and view the resulting diff. When I'm done
I revert the last merge, edit STATUS to add my votes, and commit.
Are there features others would l
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
>> Not sure how to really handle the Windows build. I guess we can just
>> add "60" if we test with it because we have no auto-detection, so
>> you're making a deliberate choice to selec
Ben Reser wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 07:10:46 -0700:
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
> > blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
> > blacklists it. (We can convert it t
On 03.07.2013 16:07, Branko Čibej wrote:
> I do have a comment; it specifically assumes the clients are browsers,
... and that the servers host web sites; important distinction there, too.
--
Branko Čibej | Director of Subversion
WANdisco // Non-Stop Data
e. br...@wandisco.com
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
> blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
> blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
> if someone asks, etc.)
>
>
On 03.07.2013 15:35, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have noted KeepAlive coming up in a few of the Serf threads.
>
> I have been looking at setting up a load-balanced Subversion cluster,
> somewhat like what Blair describes in this wiki:
>
> http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Server_performance_tuning_for_
Greg Stein writes:
> Could you try svn trunk? Set busted-proxy=yes in your config to enable
> the new behavior.
>
> Without the knob turned out, you should get a 411 error. As Stefan
> pointed out, we may want to consider detecting 411 and providing a
> better error message.
>
> With the knob ena
I have noted KeepAlive coming up in a few of the Serf threads.
I have been looking at setting up a load-balanced Subversion cluster,
somewhat like what Blair describes in this wiki:
http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Server_performance_tuning_for_Linux_and_Unix
Anyway, in looking at load balancers
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Lieven Govaerts
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Ashish,
>>
>> This is normally a question for users@, but I think Lieven was working
>> on something exactly like this already. I've cc'd him for more detail.
>
> Ashish a
On 03.07.2013 14:55, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
> blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
> blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
> if someone asks, etc.)
>
> Thoughts?
L
BDB's relicense to AGPL sparked some discussion about potentially
blacklisting it in configure or making it opt-in. Attached a patch that
blacklists it. (We can convert it to opt-in after we test with it, or
if someone asks, etc.)
Thoughts?
[[[
* build/ac-macros/berkeley-db.m4
(SVN_LIB_BERKE
On 07/03/2013 05:07 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
+ notify_failure->warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
+ _("E%06d: %s"),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 13:48:57 +0200:
> On 03.07.2013 13:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
> >> + notify_failure->warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
> >> + _("E%06d: %s"),
>
On 03.07.2013 13:37, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
>> + notify_failure->warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
>> + _("E%06d: %s"),
> Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementat
Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:22:54 +0400:
> 2013/7/2 Daniel Shahaf :
> > How about adding 'svn cleanup --rm-I' as a short option for 'svn cleanup
> > --remove-ignored'?
> >
> > Currently we have --cl as a short option for --changelist, and in the
> > past we decided not to ad
prabh...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 10:49:02 -:
> + notify_failure->warning_str = apr_psprintf(pool,
> + _("E%06d: %s"),
Would it make sense to push the E%06d: part down to the implementation
of svn_err_best_message()?
I.e., if the in
Prabhu wrote on Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 15:11:36 +0530:
> Do you want it to look like,
>
> <
> $ svnadmin verify /tmp/testrepo/ --keep-going
> * Verifying repository metadata ...
> * Verified revision 0.
> * Verified revision 1.
> * Error verifying revision 2.
> svnadmin: E160004: Final line in revisi
于 2013/7/3 18:11, Konstantin Kolinko 写道:
> 2013/7/3 Dongsheng Song :
>> On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger :
Hi There,
On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
> foll
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 11:56:16AM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> svnadmin: E165011: Repository '/tmp/testrepo' failed to verify
> Summary of corrupt revisions:
> Revision 2: E160004: Final line in revision file r2 missing space
> Revision 4: E160004: Invalid change kind in rev file
> Revision 6: E16
2013/7/3 Dongsheng Song :
> On 2013/7/3 6:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2013/7/3 Andreas Stieger :
>>> Hi There,
>>>
>>> On 02/07/13 16:00, Dongsheng Song wrote:
Today, when I merge zh_CN.po from trunk to 1.8.x, I had encounter the
following error:
$ python ../../../../trunk/
On 03.07.2013 11:41, Prabhu wrote:
> On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>
>>> +++
>>> subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c
>>> Mon Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
>>> @@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
>>> case svn_repos_notify_failure_summ
On 07/03/2013 03:11 PM, Prabhu wrote:
On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+++
subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c
Mon Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
@@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
case svn_repos_notify_failure_summary:
if
On 07/01/2013 05:35 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
+++ subversion/branches/verify-keep-going/subversion/svnadmin/svnadmin.c Mon
Jul 1 12:01:38 2013
@@ -850,13 +850,16 @@ repos_notify_handler(void *baton,
case svn_repos_notify_failure_summary:
if (notify->revision != SVN_INVALID_REVNUM
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> As noted on IRC earlier, we just deprecated BDB so that we wouldn't
>> have to continue supporting multiple backends. But it seems you have
>> just created a third/new backend.
>
> I think that
32 matches
Mail list logo
