On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 28, 2013 11:17 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
> >
> > Philip Martin writes:
> >
> > > Suppose serf were to keep track of the number of outstanding requests
> > > (it may already do that I haven't checked). Then if the number of
> > > o
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:11 PM, wrote:
> > > I agree that force-http10 is not good name and semantic. Actually
> > > these proxies is not busted: it's allowed to HTTP/1.1 proxies to
> > > require content-length if they want. And strictly speaking proxies may
> > > have different behavior for dif
[copying dev@ because I found what the issue is]
Hi,
Did some further investigation and it turns out that SVN1.8 client creates more
connections to the server when performing 'svn merge' - exceeding the xinetd's
default number of connections per source (10) and indeed, closing the
connection o
On 28/06/13 01:08, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Andreas Stieger wrote on Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 00:09:39 +0100:
>> make po-merge.py count fuzzy strings
> Personally I would have done something like if c.startswith('#,') and
> 'fuzzy' in c.split(', '): to match 'fuzzy' only as a whole word.
Good point. r1
On Jun 28, 2013 11:17 AM, "Philip Martin"
wrote:
>
> Philip Martin writes:
>
> > Suppose serf were to keep track of the number of outstanding requests
> > (it may already do that I haven't checked). Then if the number of
> > outstanding requests is zero when the 411 is received the downgrade to
Philip Martin writes:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>>> It seems to be connected to mod_deflate. My server was loading
>>> mod_deflate (but not setting up any filters) and the import works with
>>> the client setting
>>>
>>> http-compression = no
>>>
>>> but fails with
>>>
>>> http-compressio
Lieven Govaerts writes:
>> It seems to be connected to mod_deflate. My server was loading
>> mod_deflate (but not setting up any filters) and the import works with
>> the client setting
>>
>> http-compression = no
>>
>> but fails with
>>
>> http-compression = yes
>>
>> Still investigating.
>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> "Bert Huijben" writes:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
>>> Sent: vrijdag 28 juni 2013 17:18
>>> To: Ivan Zhakov
>>> Cc: Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: svn c
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 28 juni 2013 17:18
>> To: Ivan Zhakov
>> Cc: Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_s
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 28 juni 2013 17:18
> To: Ivan Zhakov
> Cc: Greg Stein; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1495419 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf: options.c ra_serf.h serf.
Philip Martin writes:
> Suppose serf were to keep track of the number of outstanding requests
> (it may already do that I haven't checked). Then if the number of
> outstanding requests is zero when the 411 is received the downgrade to
> HTTP/1.0 will be OK. Lots of client operations start with
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:40:25PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Should it print the top-most error or the bottom-most one?
>
> Here are some traces:
>
> svnadmin: SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT: Corrupt node-revision '2-1.0.r1/114'
> svnadmin: SVN_ERR_FS_CORRUPT: Found malformed header 'count 0' in
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:11:18PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:56:27PM -, prabh...@apache.org wrote:
> > > @@ -1532,6 +1610,18 @@ svn_repos_verify_fs3(svn_repos_t *repos,
> > > +{
> > > +
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:11:18PM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:56:27PM -, prabh...@apache.org wrote:
> > @@ -1532,6 +1610,18 @@ svn_repos_verify_fs3(svn_repos_t *repos,
> > +{
> > + struct error_list *err_list = APR_ARRAY_IDX(error_summary, i,
> >
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:56:27PM -, prabh...@apache.org wrote:
> @@ -1532,6 +1610,18 @@ svn_repos_verify_fs3(svn_repos_t *repos,
> +{
> + struct error_list *err_list = APR_ARRAY_IDX(error_summary, i,
> struct error_list *);
> + notify_verification_error_summary(err_
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.06.2013 17:27, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>...
>>> Also please believe that all my technical thoughts are fair and
>>> related to technical issues only. My veto above is a technical veto.
>
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> (pop quiz: who ran 'make check' with 1.7 client and 1.8 server, or 1.8
> client and 1.7 server, during the soak?).
I did it shortly before the soak, I raised issue 4348 :)
--
Philip Martin | Subversion Committer
WANdisco | Non-Stop Data
www.wandisco.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
