Windows Ruby changes

2013-05-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Paul, wrt the r1480344 group in STATUS: I think the 'rescue' block, here: ENV["PATH"].split(";").each do |path| + +# Change the cwd to path, but ignore non-existent paths. +begin + Dir.chdir(path) +rescue Errno::ENOENT +end

Re: 1.7.10 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 09:57:21AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > Philip Martin writes: > > > I see a intermittent failure in check-swig-rb that looks like an APR > > hash ordering issue. The test appears to do some sort of sorting (I > > don't know Ruby) but it doesn't always work: > > Oops! Lo

Re: svn commit: r1486044 -

2013-05-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 10:22:35AM +0100, Philip Martin wrote: > Bert Huijben writes: > > The diff command should never change the wc(no wclock, and no > > db/pristine changes), so I really hope the problem that corrupts is > > part of the merge on update, or we should check for another problem. >

Re: 1.7.10 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 05/22/2013 06:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > The 1.7.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on May > 30th so please try and get y

Re: 1.6.23 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 05/22/2013 09:08 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > The 1.6.22 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. We plan to try and release on May 30th > so please try and get your vo

Re: svn commit: r1486044 -

2013-05-25 Thread Philip Martin
Bert Huijben writes: > The diff command should never change the wc(no wclock, and no > db/pristine changes), so I really hope the problem that corrupts is > part of the merge on update, or we should check for another problem. > > Bert From: s...@apache.org > Sent: =E2=80=8E24/=E2=80=8E05/=E2=80=8

Re: 1.7.10 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread Philip Martin
Summary: +1 to release Platform: Linux (Debian/wheezy) Tested: (local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb) (serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb) swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb, ctypes-python javahl x (fsfs, bdb) Results: All tests PASS except for failure in swig-rb

Re: 1.7.10 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > I see a intermittent failure in check-swig-rb that looks like an APR > hash ordering issue. The test appears to do some sort of sorting (I > don't know Ruby) but it doesn't always work: Oops! Looking at the wrong source. On trunk the test sorts but in 1.7 it doesn't sor

Re: 1.7.10 up for signing/testing

2013-05-25 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling writes: > The 1.7.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on May > 30th so please try and get your votes/signatures