On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 16.05.2013 23:12, Mattias Engdegård wrote:
>> [[[
>> * subversion/include/svn_types.h:
>> Set SVN_UNALIGNED_ACCESS_IS_OK for PowerPC.
>> ]]]
>
> At first I thought, "that can't be right!" but it turns out that it is
> ... somewhat. Only i
21 maj 2013 kl. 12.02 skrev Bert Huijben:
Before we had a single DB we stored the workqueue items per
directory. (We
had a wc.db per directory, just like the old entries). If the
workqueue
contained an item that specified to install an item in the directory
we
could safely assume that the
20 maj 2013 kl. 22.41 skrev Daniel Shahaf:
Have you checked IRC logs for the day r1142088 was committed on?
Thanks for the reference. As far as I can make out from the
conversation, the change was made in order to handle working copies
whose directory structure had been trashed by the user
Because there is no option object that we can query from within
io.c, diff.c and other places, we have to add extra courier
parameters for every command line option we wish to add, in a
number of places.
We have 4 (potential) diff commands -- diff-cmd, diff3-cmd,
invoke-diff-cmd and invoke-diff3
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
Are you saying that VC10 produces something different?
>>> Yes, with VC10 I get "assertion failed (3)"
>>>
>>>
>> Sorry, I meant "assertion failed (0)".
>
> We have to support Visual Studio so it doesn't reall
> -Original Message-
> From: Mattias Engdegård [mailto:matti...@bredband.net]
> Sent: maandag 20 mei 2013 22:23
> To: Subversion Development
> Cc: rhuij...@collab.net
> Subject: over-tolerant code in run_file_install?
>
> When trying to consolidate file copying into svn_io_copy_file, I r
6 matches
Mail list logo
