Stefan Küng wrote on 2013-01-27:
> using a build from the svn trunk (as of r1439016), I've discovered a few
> problems when merging.
>
> svn co -r23862 https://tortoisesvn.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1.7.x/src
> tsvnsrc
> cd tsvnsrc
>
> Now for the merge:
> svn merge -c23846,23862 https://tort
On 01/29/2013 10:04 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
Should we remove the packages tree? The packages are almost certainly
terribly out of date. There's been 1 functional commit (not including
things like URL and license changes from the ASF changeover) since
2009.
To give an example the RedHat rpm packag
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> If we're not going to keep these things up to date then I think we
>> should just remove them.
>>
>
> +1 to remove. (It's all version-controlled anyway!) -- justin
+1
FWIW, I'll be at FOSDEM in Brussels this weekend (arriving on Friday
morning) - if any other SVN devs are going to be there, it'd be fun to
catch up.
Cheers. -- justin
I (Julian Foad) wrote on 2012-01-25:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> I filed the issue. I think I had in mind that we'd store multiple
>> conflicts, but I'm not quite sure.
>>
>> I agree with your plans to deal with the non-interactive --accept case.
In r1440193 I did that, closing issue #4238.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> If we're not going to keep these things up to date then I think we
> should just remove them.
>
+1 to remove. (It's all version-controlled anyway!) -- justin
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Right. I think we went thru this a while back.
>
> +1 to toss.
I couldn't find it and I'm pretty sure we did it on IRC. So I sent
the email with the intent of allowing everyone to respond. Given the
feedback so far, unless someone has a real
On Jan 29, 2013 4:54 PM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:04:36AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> > Should we remove the packages tree?
>
> Yes, please. I remember suggesting to remove it before. +1
Right. I think we went thru this a while back.
+1 to toss.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:04:36AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> Should we remove the packages tree?
Yes, please. I remember suggesting to remove it before. +1
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I think there might be third party implementations (CollabNet, WANdisco,
> VisualSvn) that might rely on these values?
>
> So maybe somebody wants to respond?
>
>
> Personally I would prefer to see an error somewhere in SVN_ERR_AUTHZ to at
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> I noticed code like this in wc_db.c:
>>>
>>> const char *relpath = svn_sqlite__column_text(stmt, 0, NULL);
>>> svn_kind_t kind = svn_sqlite__column_token(stmt, 1, kind_map);
>>>
>>> According to the docs [1], the second _column
> -Original Message-
> From: bre...@apache.org [mailto:bre...@apache.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 januari 2013 19:28
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1440047 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/libsvn_repos/repos-test.c
>
> Author: breser
> Date: Tue Jan 29 18:27:5
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Gabriela Gibson
wrote:
> Please see the attachment for a long long list of questions :)
Would have been easier for me to look at this if you'd just have
included it inline in the email or at least as a text/plain attachment
(your mailer seems to have decided it wa
On 01/29/2013 01:04 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Should we remove the packages tree? The packages are almost certainly
> terribly out of date. There's been 1 functional commit (not including
> things like URL and license changes from the ASF changeover) since
> 2009.
[...]
> If we're not going to kee
Should we remove the packages tree? The packages are almost certainly
terribly out of date. There's been 1 functional commit (not including
things like URL and license changes from the ASF changeover) since
2009.
To give an example the RedHat rpm packages don't have a rhel-6
package, the documen
> -Original Message-
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 januari 2013 18:35
> To: 'Julian Foad'; 'Subversion Development'
> Subject: RE: Unsafe WC DB calls: sqlite_column_text(..., pool=NULL)
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Julian Foad [mailto
On 22/01/13 11:15, Gabriela Gibson wrote:
Part of my 2013 OPW Project for Subversion is to add the Googletest
test suite to be compiled by the build system.
Please see the attachment for a long long list of questions :)
gtestquestions1
Description: application/shellscript
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julianf...@btopenworld.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 januari 2013 17:15
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Unsafe WC DB calls: sqlite_column_text(..., pool=NULL)
>
> I noticed code like this in wc_db.c:
>
> const char *relpath = svn_sqli
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:43 AM, Evgeny Kotkov
wrote:
> Since r1438206 [1] there is a way to write blackbox tests for the 'svnauthz'
> tool (via svnauthz_tests.py).
>
> So, this patch is a follow-up to r1438407 [2], which adds two tests for the
> "svnauthz --groups-file" behavior.
>
> [1] https://
I noticed code like this in wc_db.c:
const char *relpath = svn_sqlite__column_text(stmt, 0, NULL);
svn_kind_t kind = svn_sqlite__column_token(stmt, 1, kind_map);
According to the docs [1], the second _column_*() call can overwrite the value
returned by the first one, since we passed NULL as
Hi,
Since r1438206 [1] there is a way to write blackbox tests for the 'svnauthz'
tool (via svnauthz_tests.py).
So, this patch is a follow-up to r1438407 [2], which adds two tests for the
"svnauthz --groups-file" behavior.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1438206
[2] http
21 matches
Mail list logo
