Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing

2012-12-30 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:50:19 +0100: > I remember I could successfully build 1.6.19 with serf-0.7.1, so maybe > I'll just do that for 1.6.20 too. However, maybe it's easy to fix > this? The problem seems to be that, from serf-1.0 onwards, the > resulting lib file is serf-1.

[svnbench] Revision: 1427024 compiled Dec 31 2012, 00:21:44 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2012-12-30 Thread neels
1.7.0@1181106 vs. trunk@1426845 Started at Mon Dec 31 00:25:22 UTC 2012 *DISCLAIMER* - This tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM. This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working copy layer, *only*. These results are *not* generally true for everyone. Charts of t

Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing

2012-12-30 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Ben Reser wrote: > The 1.6.20 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. > Please get the tarballs from > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion > and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on January > 4th so please try and

Proposal for OPW project

2012-12-30 Thread Gabriela Gibson
Hi, As you may know, I have been familiarising myself with Subversion with a view to obtaining an internship under the Outreach Program for Women. However, I have yet to decide on a project. For those that aren't aware, this is a 3 month sponsored internship similar to the Google Summer of Code.