On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> That's another interesting bit: davautocheck happily deletes the HTTP
> directory without asking. Or rather it asks, but just answers "yes" to
> itself. Digging ...
That bit works fine here. Though it does have a 32 second timeout
which giv
I need one more signature for Windows in order to release. Listed
expected release day is Monday December 17th. So I'll need to get the
signatures by Sunday in order to have the files staged for that
release date.
So if someone else can test/sign Windows before Monday that would be
appreciated,
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> -maxdepth please? So it doesn't recurse into svn-test-work.
>
> It might be better to be explicit:
>
> "$ABS_BUILDDIR"/subversion/*/.libs/
Yeah my find was overzealous.
Committed your last suggestion in r1422141
Julian Foad writes:
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1422042&view=rev
>
>> Log:
>> Fix issue 4210, rep-cache not reseting SQLite statements on error.
>
> I noticed the other day that WC DB code in many places fails to reset
> stmts on error, but that svn_sqlite__get_statement() automatica
bre...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 22:34:08 -:
> Author: breser
> Date: Thu Dec 13 22:34:06 2012
> New Revision: 1421583
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1421583&view=rev
> Log:
> Make davautocheck work for OS X.
>
> rpath support on OS X doesn't help us as much as it do
arfre...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 20:21:13 -:
> Author: arfrever
> Date: Thu Dec 13 20:21:12 2012
> New Revision: 1421489
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1421489&view=rev
> Log:
> * configure.ac: Update recommended version of sqlite.
> * get-deps.sh: Update versions o
On 14.12.2012 21:28, Ben Reser wrote:
> The odd part there is that it's actually the first --non-interactive
> checkout that's failing in that test.
Sigh. I keep forgetting that I configure with
--disable-plaintext-password-storage.
The test depends on storing the credentials from one comma
On 14.12.2012 21:28, Ben Reser wrote:
> The odd part there is that it's actually the first --non-interactive
> checkout that's failing in that test. What's in the logs for httpd?
> Anything interesting?
That's another interesting bit: davautocheck happily deletes the HTTP
directory without asking
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
Summary
---
+1 to release
Platform
Windows XP
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 14.12.2012 20:38, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
>>>
>>> $ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.p
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1422042&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix issue 4210, rep-cache not reseting SQLite statements on error.
I noticed the other day that WC DB code in many places fails to reset stmts on
error, but that svn_sqlite__get_statement() automatically resets the stmt if it
has
On 14.12.2012 20:38, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
>>
>> $ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
>>
>>
>> This is the only failure in the test suite.
> Not
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
>
> $ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
>
>
> This is the only failure in the test suite.
Not happening here. What's the output of the test
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 19:37:45 +0100:
>> Should .swig_checked be in the tarball?
>
> Don't think so; there is a build-outputs.mk target to create it (with
> a possibly-relevant comment about autogen.sh --release), and 'm
Branko Čibej writes:
> Yes indeed, I'm beginning to realize that I shouldn't have tested only
> ra-local. I'll put the strcmp back.
I've done that.
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Is anyone else seeing this? Running with current trunk and
$ make davautocheck PARALLEL=1 TESTS=subversion/tests/cmdline/basic_tests.py
This is the only failure in the test suite.
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 19:37:45 +0100:
> On 10.12.2012 23:07, Ben Reser wrote:
> > The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> > Please get the tarballs from
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> > and add your signatures there.
>
>
On 10.12.2012 23:07, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
Should .swig_checked be in the tarball?
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Sub
On 14.12.2012 13:14, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: br...@apache.org [mailto:br...@apache.org]
>> Sent: vrijdag 14 december 2012 05:58
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1421668 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
>> include/svn_error.h libsvn
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:25:05AM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
> Consider >this< my typical potty-mouth response. I'll skip the
> actuals, and move along in peace...
Save it for later. I'll ask for more next time we have a drink together :)
Paul Burba wrote on Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 19:10:17 -0500:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:40 AM, wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Thu Nov 15 05:40:40 2012
> > New Revision: 1409652
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1409652&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add a skeleton XFail test. There is no
On 12/13/2012 05:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> IMHO, the option to make ra_serf respect a more stricter
> interpretation of the editor api is something we need to give to a
> developer, not to a user via config.
I get the gist of what you're saying, but don't agree with the specifics
starting po
> -Original Message-
> From: br...@apache.org [mailto:br...@apache.org]
> Sent: vrijdag 14 december 2012 05:58
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1421668 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/svn_error.h libsvn_subr/error.c tests/libsvn_subr/error-test.c
>
On 12/10/2012 08:15 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
Prabhu Gnana Sundar
This patch is a follow up of the long discussion we had in thread [1]. This
patch implements a new switch "--keep-going" to svnadmin verify.
If "--keep-going" is set(True), svnadmin verify would continue to run
till verifying all t
24 matches
Mail list logo
