Hi Peter,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
>> > "### http-library Which library to use for
>> > http/https"
>> >
>> >NL
>> > "###
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> In the 1.8 release notes We can raise attention in the fact that a 1.8
> server should turn off skelta mode if necessary, such as when each GET
> request causes an authentication request to LDAP.
>
+1. I'm all for documenting and giving k
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:54:00PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
>> > Author: lgo
>> > Date: Wed Dec 5 20:46:33 2012
>> > New Revision: 1417639
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=14176
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>> It is relevant because we already have a SVNAllowBulkUpdates flag that
>> gives the admin some options to define this exact behavior. That flag
>> gives the admin the option to
> > "### http-library Which library to use for
> > http/https"
> >
> > NL
> > "### connections."
> > NL
> > +"### bulk_upda
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I'm just posting this so you (Philip et el.) can take a look if you want to.
> I might proceed by extending the tests to check props and then committing it
> if it works, but really I want to factor it better -- maybe by reusing
> svn_wc_mer
I've just been getting my teeth into this update-move code and this is a rough
patch (based on code duplication rather than proper factoring) that is where
I've got to. It supposedly adds support for pushing the incoming
properties-change across to the moved location, where currently we just pu
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 03:54:00PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
> > Author: lgo
> > Date: Wed Dec 5 20:46:33 2012
> > New Revision: 1417639
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1417639&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add a Force option to SVNAllowBulkUpdate
On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 08:54:05PM -, l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: lgo
> Date: Wed Dec 5 20:54:03 2012
> New Revision: 1417642
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1417642&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a bulk-updates option to the global and per-server section in servers.
> This allows a use
Hi,
I have generated the attached [PATCH] as a part of the contribution i
wanted to make towards the subversion's swig-py project as a part of the
OPW program.
Having chosen the Python Bindings Problem, i tried learning all the
prerequisites for me to become able to contribute even in the mildest o
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> It is relevant because we already have a SVNAllowBulkUpdates flag that
> gives the admin some options to define this exact behavior. That flag
> gives the admin the option to disable bulk updates, to ensure that
> each individually request
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
Author: lgo
Date: Wed Dec 5 20:46:33 2012
New Revision: 1417639
Some thoughts on how part of the Ev2 documentation maybe should be. I'm not
confident enough to commit this; I'm not sure it makes much more sense with
this amendment that without it. Any comments?
Index: subversion/include/svn_editor.h
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:46 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: lgo
>>> Date: Wed Dec 5 20:46:33 2012
>>> New Revision: 1417639
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1417639&view=rev
>>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
