Ivan,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
> [...]
>
>> Also, there might well be a windows-kerberos triple trusted
>> domain .. setup somewhere where svn+neon works and
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> when OpenSSL is built with zlib, it will automatically compress all data
>> sent over an SSL connection. You can see this in the initial handshake
>> "Client Hello"
This problem is why mod_cgid exists. Been there. Done that. It creates a
daemon early, before threads/mem are allocated. The child CGI processes are
then fast to spawn.
Cheers,
-g
(*) http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_cgid.html
On Nov 13, 2012 6:44 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> Philip Mar
Philip Martin wrote on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 21:30:00 +:
> Perhaps we could start up a separate hook script process before
> allocating the large FSFS cache and then delegate the fork/exec to that
> smaller process?
If so, let's have that daemon handle all forks we might do, not just
those rela
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> If I configure a server with an FSFS cache that uses about 50% of
> available memory and then I use the server so the cache is in use I find
> that hook scripts fail to run because the fork/exec cannot allocate
> memory. The user sees:
>
I
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
> >> > Using serf 1.1.x@1691 and subversion trunk@1408335 as 1.8.
> >> > Using 1.7.7 with neon as 1.7.
> >> > Using subversion trunk as my dataset.
> >> >
> >> > The server CPU and bandwidth to service one checkout:
> From: Philip Martin
> kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes:
>
> > *one* of my servers currently logs around 10GB per week with neon
> > only access. I'd probably have to change from rotating logs
> > weekly to rotating logs hourly! Disabling logging is not an option.
>
> It depends what sort o
If I configure a server with an FSFS cache that uses about 50% of
available memory and then I use the server so the cache is in use I find
that hook scripts fail to run because the fork/exec cannot allocate
memory. The user sees:
$ svn mkdir -mm http://localhost:/obj/repo/A
svn: E165002: Faile
kmra...@rockwellcollins.com writes:
> *one* of my servers currently logs around 10GB per week with neon
> only access. I'd probably have to change from rotating logs
> weekly to rotating logs hourly! Disabling logging is not an option.
It depends what sort of access patterns you see. The probl
On 13.11.2012 21:03, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, t
On 13.11.2012 20:48, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
every connection nee
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>> We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
>>> here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
>> here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
>> every connection needed to be re-authenticated. With
On 13.11.2012 14:58, Mark Phippard wrote:
We did some testing in our lab, and the KeepAlive settings help a lot
here. Without any KeepAlive, then obviously every Serf request on
every connection needed to be re-authenticated. With KeepAlive on and
the connection limit set high enough then it w
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 02:33:09PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 11/13/2012 02:21 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Are you sure this is not a bug checking the wrong X or setting the wrong
> > X to TRUE? I don't know ra_serf very well so this isn't obvious to me.
>
> I'm pretty sure it was a b
On 11/13/2012 02:21 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:32:00PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Tue Nov 13 17:31:59 2012
>> New Revision: 1408849
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1408849&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/up
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:32:00PM -, cmpil...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Tue Nov 13 17:31:59 2012
> New Revision: 1408849
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1408849&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c
> (end_report): Remove redundant boolean assig
On Nov 13, 2012 4:00 AM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
>...
> extract a detailed design. In the meantime, if it makes you feel better,
> you can treat that branch as my private playground that's never intended
> to be merged back to trunk as-is.
Could you add a branch readme, stating such? I think that w
> Greg Stein writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
> > wrote:
> >>...
> >> Another concern is the increased server logging due to the large
> >> increase in the number of requests. A 1.8 server does better than
older
> >> servers, about 50% fewer requests on checkout, bu
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> We at WANdisco had a discussion about serf in 1.8 today; I'd said I
> summarise to the list.
>
> One concern is the impact on server performance, particularly older
> servers, of serf as the only client. Issue
> http://subversion.tigris.org/
On 11/13/2012 03:19 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>>>
>>> Igor, I took a look at your patch. I was confused by one aspect:
>>> why split
>>> the from_addr into words an encode each one individually, rather
>>> than
>>> encoding the whole header value like we do for the Subject: header?
>>> I dug
>>> aroun
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz writes:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>
>>> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>>>
>>
>> I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
>> the
On 11/13/2012 03:41 AM, danie...@tigris.org wrote:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2625
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional comments from danie...@tigris.org Tue Nov 13 00:41:51
> -0800 2012 ---
> Six years later...
>
> Neon has been removed, Serf replaced it, and bui
> -Original Message-
> From: vijay [mailto:vi...@collab.net]
> Sent: dinsdag 13 november 2012 14:06
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement '--include-externals' option to 'svn list'
>
> On Tuesday 13 November 2012 03:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> >> Attached the
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 03:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Attached the updated patch and log message.
+ /* Notify that we're about to handle an external. */
+ SVN_ERR(list_func(baton, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
+externals_parent_url,
+i
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>>
>
> I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
> the 2.4 series?
r1103315
You wrote about it:
http://mail-archives.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> Is that a fix that we can get in apache 2.2? Justin?
>
I don't readily recall the issue in mod_deflate. Is it already resolved in
the 2.4 series?
> work. These concern maybe only 1% of the users, but we should have a
> plan to support
rhuij...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:57:02 -:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Tue Nov 13 11:57:01 2012
> New Revision: 1408686
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1408686&view=rev
> Log:
> Apply some correctness and debug easing changes on svnmucc.
>
> @@ -792,8 +785,10 @@ ex
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> The proposed approach here is to disable SSL compression completely,
> so in terms of the above that leaves us with scenario 2.
>
> Serf doesn't have an option currently to disable SSL compression from
> the client side. I plan to add it i
On 12.11.2012 18:34, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: maandag 12 november 2012 17:49
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1408325 - /subversion/branches/wc-collate-
>> path/subversion/libsvn_subr/sq
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Philip Martin
[...]
> Also, there might well be a windows-kerberos triple trusted
> domain .. setup somewhere where svn+neon works and svn+serf doesn't
> work.
What is "windows-kerberos tripli trusted dom
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>> Hi,
>> when OpenSSL is built with zlib, it will automatically compress all data
>> sent over an SSL connection. You can see this in the initial handshake
>> "Client Hello" and "Se
> >
> > Igor, I took a look at your patch. I was confused by one aspect:
> > why split
> > the from_addr into words an encode each one individually, rather
> > than
> > encoding the whole header value like we do for the Subject: header?
> > I dug
> > around in the related RFCs, and if I'm reading
33 matches
Mail list logo
