stef...@apache.org writes:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Tue Oct 16 01:13:14 2012
> New Revision: 1398599
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398599&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/svndumpfilter/main.c
> (create_stdio_stream): fix memory class warning under Windows
This appears to cause a bui
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 15.10.2012 17:14, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> > However, if you have a long-running process like a server, that race
> > condition extends now extends over its whole lifetime. I.e. once a
> > revprop got read, any change to its value by a pre
On 15.10.2012 17:14, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> However, if you have a long-running process like a server, that race
> condition extends now extends over its whole lifetime. I.e. once a
> revprop got read, any change to its value by a pre-1.8 tool may never
> get detected.
Ouch. This seems wrong. I'
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:16:23AM +0200, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > danie...@tigris.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 16:21:37 -0700:
> > > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
> > >
> > > In short, hotcopy fails becaus
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> danie...@tigris.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 16:21:37 -0700:
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
> >
> > In short, hotcopy fails because r1's revprops have been packed.
>
> If anyone wonders how I found this: I r
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398389&view=rev
> Log:
> Enable SQLite exclusive locking for the command line client as this is
[...]
This deprecates svn_client_config_create() and adds
/** Initialize a client context.
* Set @a *ctx to a client context object, allocated in @a pool,
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> phi...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 17:09:02 -:
>> Author: philip
>> Date: Mon Oct 15 17:09:01 2012
>> New Revision: 1398389
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398389&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Enable SQLite exclusive locking for the command line client
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> phi...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 22:20:32 -:
>> Author: philip
>> Date: Mon Oct 15 22:20:32 2012
>> New Revision: 1398541
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398541&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * STATUS: Clarify effect of r1237779.
>>
>> Modified:
>>
phi...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 17:09:02 -:
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon Oct 15 17:09:01 2012
> New Revision: 1398389
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398389&view=rev
> Log:
> Enable SQLite exclusive locking for the command line client as this is
>
> +"### Se
phi...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 22:20:32 -:
> Author: philip
> Date: Mon Oct 15 22:20:32 2012
> New Revision: 1398541
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398541&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Clarify effect of r1237779.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:24:12 +0200:
> libsvn_fs_fs/structure says that a pack file starts with an
> svndiff-encoded integer. Where is that integer written, please?
>
I meant, "Where is the code that writes that integer".
> serialize_revprops_header() doesn't write an svn
libsvn_fs_fs/structure says that a pack file starts with an
svndiff-encoded integer. Where is that integer written, please?
serialize_revprops_header() doesn't write an svndiff-encoded integer, so
I suspect the two binary bytes at the start of a revprops pack file are
actually an artifact of zlib
danie...@tigris.org wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 16:21:37 -0700:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4246
>
> In short, hotcopy fails because r1's revprops have been packed.
If anyone wonders how I found this: I read r1358721:1358725, noticed
that upgrade/pack/recover were ment
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 21:34:22 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Jun 10 21:34:21 2012
> New Revision: 1348666
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348666&view=rev
> Log:
> When handing out node contents, the delta streams don't need
> to calculate MD5 checksums
Philip Martin writes:
> Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (It also has the pretty odd side effect that it's not safe to run
>>> 'svnadmin1.7 setrevprop' and 'svnadmin1.8 dump' concurrently on the
>>> same repository...)
>>>
>>
>> That's
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> (It also has the pretty odd side effect that it's not safe to run
>> 'svnadmin1.7 setrevprop' and 'svnadmin1.8 dump' concurrently on the
>> same repository...)
>>
>
> That's a misrepresentation of what is going o
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 19:32:57 +0200:
> > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf >wrote:
> >
> > > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:56 +0300:
> > > > stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2
On 10/15/2012 01:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 19:32:57 +0200:
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> What happens if 'svnadmin1.7 setrevprop' is run while a 1.8 server is
>>> running? Will the 1.8 server miss svnadmin1.7's ch
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 19:32:57 +0200:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:56 +0300:
> > > stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:12:49 -:
> > > > Author: stefan2
> > > > Date: Sun A
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:56 +0300:
> > stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:12:49 -:
> > > Author: stefan2
> > > Date: Sun Apr 29 09:12:48 2012
> > > New Revision: 1331883
> > >
> > > URL: http://sv
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 12:58:56 +0300:
> stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 09:12:49 -:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Sun Apr 29 09:12:48 2012
> > New Revision: 1331883
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1331883&view=rev
> > Log:
> > SvnAdmin shoul
Ben Reser wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:44:14 -0400:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Found these two:
> >
> > subversion/libsvn_subr/cache_config.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
> > subversion/svnserve/main.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
> >
> > (which should use #if, not #if
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Found these two:
>
> subversion/libsvn_subr/cache_config.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
> subversion/svnserve/main.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
>
> (which should use #if, not #ifdef)
>
> I don't have time to audit the entire tree --- I checked only th
Found these two:
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache_config.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
subversion/svnserve/main.c:#ifdef APR_HAS_THREADS
(which should use #if, not #ifdef)
I don't have time to audit the entire tree --- I checked only these two
libraries and this one macro, not all source files and all ma
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:30 AM, wrote:
>> Author: ivan
>> Date: Mon Oct 15 11:30:08 2012
>> New Revision: 1398252
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398252&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make code a little bit more clear and faster.
>>
>> * su
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:30 AM, wrote:
> Author: ivan
> Date: Mon Oct 15 11:30:08 2012
> New Revision: 1398252
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398252&view=rev
> Log:
> Make code a little bit more clear and faster.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/error.c
> (svn_error_wrap_apr): Use apr_
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:59 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> What solutions do we have?
>
> - Something automated? Can a slave server contact a master server with
> a custom feature negotiation request and cache the results?
Is this possible? Could we try to contact the master at server
start
On 10/15/2012 05:48 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> It feels good to argue about something entirely pointless for a change :)
Indeed. You guys aren't even painting the bikeshed siding. You're painting
the roofing sheets -- which will be immediately and completely covered with
tar paper and shingles
On 10/14/2012 01:22 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> +Note that Bert will probably suggest soon that there be a way to flip
>> +off the server-side support for this to accomodate WebDAV proxy
>> +configurations where the slave and master are of different pedigrees.
>
> Do we actually support this? I r
Fellow devs,
I begin my week feeling constrained by the little bits of extra work
involved in keeping our WebDAV proxy support sane every time we add a
feature that changes the protocol for write requests over DAV. The extra
work isn't hard work: just add yet another httpd.conf option so admins
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:20:48PM -, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Sun Oct 14 23:20:48 2012
> New Revision: 1398147
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398147&view=rev
> Log:
> Easter egg.
>
> * subversion/svn/conflict-callbacks.c
> (handle_text_conflict): Us
31 matches
Mail list logo
