On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> P.S.: I wonder if I should "upgrade" my 2kbit/SHA512 RSA key to 4kbit?
I don't think there's any particular need to do that at this point. I
used a 4096 key size because I figured it might give me a little more
life out of this key.
Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
>> I'd like to plan the details for the Greenwich, Connecticut
>> opportunity no later than Tuesday October 8th, so please reply ASAP if
>> you're interested in that. I'll post more details once I've
>> figured them out.
>
> I am interested in partic
Poking around subversion/libsvn_subr/gpg_agent.c I found this snippet
(at around line 325):
[[[
/* Send DISPLAY to the gpg-agent daemon. */
display = getenv("DISPLAY");
if (display != NULL)
{
request = apr_psprintf(pool, "OPTION display=%s\n", display);
if (!send_option(sd, b
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> I am interested in participating in the keysigning in Greenwich.
> Though I will note that October 8th is a Monday this year, not a
> Tuesday. :)
I meant tomorrow Tuesday October 9th. Sorry for the typo and confusion.
On 06.10.2012 00:10, Ben Reser wrote:
> I plan on organizing key signing at both events if there is sufficient
> people interested and there will be keys that need signing. Given the
> issue the SHA-1 issue described above and the key signing party
> options. Now might be a excellent time to gene
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Given that we're coming up on a couple of opportunities for various
> developers to get together an potentially sign keys I thought I'd
> bring this subject up.
>
> 1) SHA-1 based keys should be migrated off of. The US Government's
> requirement
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> Voting is currently at:
>>
>> Unix: 2 (brane, cmpilato)
>> Windows: (pburba, markphip)
>
> Now at:
>
> Unix: 3 (brane, cmpilato, philip)
> Windows: 2 (pburba, markphip)
We've reached sufficient
7 matches
Mail list logo
