1.7.7 up for testing/signing

2012-10-03 Thread Ben Reser
The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing. Please get the tarballs from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion and add your signatures there. Thanks!

svn-role reintegrates Re: svn commit: r1392727 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ STATUS subversion/libsvn_ra/ra_loader.h subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/options.c subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c subversi

2012-10-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
svn-r...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:02:25 -: > Author: svn-role > Date: Tue Oct 2 04:02:24 2012 > New Revision: 1392727 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1392727&view=rev > Log: > Reintegrate the 1.7.x-serf-server-root-segfaults branch: Shall we make svn-role run 'sv

Re: svn commit: r1393521 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_props.h tests/cmdline/svnlook_tests.py

2012-10-03 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, wrote: > Author: cmpilato > Date: Wed Oct 3 14:51:36 2012 > New Revision: 1393521 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393521&view=rev > Log: > Use "svn:txn:" as the namespace for ephemeral txnprops, not > "svn:txn-". I was operating under this memory of S

Re: Please review Symmetric Merge

2012-10-03 Thread Julian Foad
C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 09/13/2012 06:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote: >> Hi, merge fans and QA fans. >> >> As you've seen, the 'symmetric merge' code is live in trunk and >> destined to be in 1.8. >> >> The principle is nice; however, the current implementation is a rather >> ugly hack, be

Re: Please review Symmetric Merge

2012-10-03 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/13/2012 06:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > Hi, merge fans and QA fans. > > As you've seen, the 'symmetric merge' code is live in trunk and destined > to be in 1.8. > > The principle is nice; however, the current implementation is a rather > ugly hack, being just a layer on top of the existing '

Re: [RFC] Inheritable Properties Branch: Ready for Review

2012-10-03 Thread Paul Burba
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 2:38 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 09/12/2012 03:31 PM, Paul Burba wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> A while back I started working on a branch[1] to implement inheritable >> properties, ultimately in pursuit of a server dictated config >> solution, as discussed here >> http://svn

Re: [PATCH] Add support for http_proxy and https_proxy environment variables

2012-10-03 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/25/2012 11:32 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 25.09.2012 17:10, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:01:44AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>> On 09/25/2012 10:42 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 25.09.2012 16:37, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > +1 on the optional libproxy depend

Re: [RFC] Inheritable Properties Branch: Ready for Review

2012-10-03 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/12/2012 03:31 PM, Paul Burba wrote: > Hi All, > > A while back I started working on a branch[1] to implement inheritable > properties, ultimately in pursuit of a server dictated config > solution, as discussed here > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-02/0207.shtml > > I've finished the ge