1.7.0@1181106 vs. trunk@1380056
Started at Mon Sep 3 00:24:52 UTC 2012
*Disclaimer* - This tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working
copy layer, *only*. These results are *not* generally true for everyone.
Averaged-to
Роман Донченко писал в своём письме Mon, 06 Aug 2012
03:19:23 +0400:
[[[
On Windows, don't strip the Content-Type field from .po files during
their
compilation.
...
]]]
Got approval from brane on IRC; committed in r1380056.
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 22:11:11
+0200:
> 2012-09-02 12:02:59 Raphael Kubo da Costa napisał(a):
> > > > What else needs to be done for it to be decided whether it makes sense
> > > > to remove the check now?
>
> We need to decide if we support GCC <4.3.0
2012-09-02 12:02:59 Raphael Kubo da Costa napisał(a):
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 11:05:02 -0300:
> > > c++locale.h does not seem to exist in
> > > libstdc++ 4.7.1 in a Linux machine I have access to, and it does not
> > > include libintl.h on li
as...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 18:30:10 -:
> +Large repositories for testing:
> +
> +GCC: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk (svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches)
> +SVN: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/)
> +
Welcome back. Review below:
as...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 18:26:42 -:
> +./get-deps.sh
> +cd apr/; ./buildconf; cd ..
> +cd apr-util/; ./buildconf; cd ..
> +cd apr-util/xml/expat/; ./buildconf.sh; cd ../../..
get-deps.sh downloads tarballs; I believe running buildconf is onl
Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:02:59 -0300:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 11:05:02 -0300:
> >> What else needs to be done for it to be decided whether it makes sense
> >> to remove the check now?
> >
> > Send a patch that
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote on Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 11:05:02 -0300:
>> What else needs to be done for it to be decided whether it makes sense
>> to remove the check now?
>
> Send a patch that removes the check, ask people to test it on various
> platforms, commit it if no
8 matches
Mail list logo