Re: Temporary implementation of 'blame of UTF-16 file'

2012-08-01 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 1:44 AM, 김성훈2 [duinggul] wrote: > Hi, I’m using Subversion everyday. :-) > > Recently, I converted native text files ( in my company’s project repository > ) to UTF-16 files. > > The problem was that Subversion library does not support ‘blame of UTF-16 > file’ currently. >

Re: Symmetric merge and deleted subtrees

2012-08-01 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Julian Foad wrote: > I'm investigating a discrepancy that shows up, when 'symmetric merge' is > enabled [1], in the notifications printed by some merges. Merge_tests 78 > fails because the expected notification for the last merge is: > > --- Merging r6 through r

Re: rep-cache sanity check on commit

2012-08-01 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Philip Martin > > > >> I suppose we might want to > >> construct the full-text corresponding to the representation to verify > >> the checksum. > > > > > > Yes. Worst thing that

Re: [Issue 4215] --include-externals option for svn merge

2012-08-01 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 08/01/2012 05:23 AM, s...@tigris.org wrote: > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4215 > > User stsp changed the following: > > What|Old value |New value > >

Re: rep-cache sanity check on commit

2012-08-01 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Philip Martin > >> I suppose we might want to >> construct the full-text corresponding to the representation to verify >> the checksum. > > > Yes. Worst thing that might happen is a crash because > we didn't check some buffer size. combi

Re: rep-cache sanity check on commit

2012-08-01 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Philip Martin > >> We do not need to verify the whole revision or the whole >> rep-cache. >> > > I only thought that it is hard to verify that a given offset > range actually *is* a representation. To verify that, there > must be some no

Re: rep-cache sanity check on commit

2012-08-01 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Philip Martin > > wrote: > > > >> When the commit process finds a representation in the rep-cache the only > >> sanity check that happens is that the revision must be less than