Failed to build Revision: 1348694.
> From: Ashod Nakashian
>To: Subversion Development
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:16 AM
>Subject: Offline
>
>All,
>
>I'll have limited access to the net for the next couple of weeks. I'll try to
>check my mail, but only intermittently.
>
>
>Cheers,
>Ash
>
I still have very limited access
On Jun 10, 2012 3:29 AM, "Justin Erenkrantz" wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 8, 2012, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>...
>> Sure. Attached.
>
>
> From a quick review of the patch, I am not seeing how we are delaying the
client's editor drive to set the property until we have received the file
contents. A
On Jun 10, 2012 3:20 AM, "Justin Erenkrantz" wrote:
>
> On Friday, June 8, 2012, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>> On 06/08/2012 03:15 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> > Wow, but performance will be much more interesting if we inline
>> > properties to REPORT response. Mike, could you please share your
>> >
On 10.06.2012 12:55, Bert Huijben wrote:
When I look at the stack trace in this mail it appears that you call the
status function with a NULL path. Why shouldn’t that fail at some level?
You are supposed to provide a path, not NULL to our api 😊
(I’m not sure if we can trust the rest of the stackt
When I look at the stack trace in this mail it appears that you call the
status function with a NULL path. Why shouldn’t that fail at some level?
You are supposed to provide a path, not NULL to our api 😊
(I’m not sure if we can trust the rest of the stacktrace if you didn’t
provide NULL)
Bert
Hi,
An access violation (strlen() for NULL) happens when fetching the
status. Stacktrace attached.
16 crash dumps available here:
https://www.crash-server.com/Problem.aspx?ClientID=tsvn&ProblemID=1504
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
On Friday, June 8, 2012, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 03:15 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Wow, but performance will be much more interesting if we inline
> > properties to REPORT response. Mike, could you please share your
> > incomplete patch for including properties to REPORT response?
On Friday, June 8, 2012, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 06/08/2012 03:15 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Wow, but performance will be much more interesting if we inline
> > properties to REPORT response. Mike, could you please share your
> > incomplete patch for including properties to REPORT response?
On Friday, June 8, 2012, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> That's ... amazing. I wonder where we'll pay for it.
>
One question: what happens when the WC's pristine gets corrupted. That is,
we originally get the pristine properly, stash it in the local DB, but
something happens later and that file changes c
10 matches
Mail list logo
