Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Dustin Lang
> wrote:
>> ...
>>> You can use svn_sort_compare_items_lexically because entries are single
>>> path components that do not contain slashes. In which case
>>> svn_sort_compare_items_as_paths produces the same result but is less
Hyrum K Wright wrote on Tue, May 29, 2012 at 20:04:24 -0500:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 29, 2012 at 16:28:19 -0400:
> >> I would suggest any logical change that can apply to trunk should be
> >> submitted to dev@. If it helps trunk,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 29, 2012 at 16:28:19 -0400:
>> I would suggest any logical change that can apply to trunk should be
>> submitted to dev@. If it helps trunk, or is at least neutral, then I'd
>> support it.
>>
>> We couldn't digest
On 05/21/2012 04:18 AM, Vladimir Berezniker wrote:
Hyrum,
4. Use runtime rather than checked exceptions.
I strongly dislike checked exceptions in code paths where there is
no expected recovery logic that can be applied. This just forces people
to either write a lot of try catch blocks that
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Dustin Lang wrote:
>...
>> You can use svn_sort_compare_items_lexically because entries are single
>> path components that do not contain slashes. In which case
>> svn_sort_compare_items_as_paths produces the same result but is less
>> efficient.
>
> The paths are
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Julian Foad
wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I want to update you all on the "symmetric merge" [1] status and my plans,
> and invite your thoughts and any assistance you can give.
>
> I'll be presenting this subject at Elego's SvnDay [2] and at WANdisco events
> in October,
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, May 29, 2012 at 16:28:19 -0400:
> I would suggest any logical change that can apply to trunk should be
> submitted to dev@. If it helps trunk, or is at least neutral, then I'd
> support it.
>
> We couldn't digest your initial 27 patches :-), but some minor ones showing
> u
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the constructive review! I accept your nits, but have one comment:
You can use svn_sort_compare_items_lexically because entries are single path
components that do not contain slashes. In which case
svn_sort_compare_items_as_paths produces the same result but is less
ef
I would suggest any logical change that can apply to trunk should be
submitted to dev@. If it helps trunk, or is at least neutral, then I'd
support it.
We couldn't digest your initial 27 patches :-), but some minor ones showing
up should be just fine. I would guess you'll be looking for a +1 from
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 03:09:08PM -0400, Dustin Lang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is my first time working on the subversion code, so be gentle :)
>
> I believe the attached patch solves one component of #4134
> ("svnadmin dump files are not reproducible, due to APR 1.4.6 hash
> order changes"), nam
Hi,
This is my first time working on the subversion code, so be gentle :)
I believe the attached patch solves one component of #4134 ("svnadmin dump files
are not reproducible, due to APR 1.4.6 hash order changes"), namely that deleted
nodes are stored in a hash and dumped out in (now-arbitra
Vladimir,
I haven't forgotten your patches or the other thread about the editor, but I
also haven't had a chance to review them. My connectivity will be spotty over
the next few days, so it may be later this week before I have meaningful
feedback. (Hopefully others can chime in before that, th
12 matches
Mail list logo
