Re: ISSUE: "To many open files" not being logged by master server when sync fails.

2012-05-02 Thread Kenneth Miles
On 03/05/12 15:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:14:24 +0300: Kenneth Miles wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:15 +1000: NOTE: "master server" is synced repository r0 property svn:sync-from-url and URL is svn://voyager-svn:3691/egm/QLD-Releases

Re: ISSUE: "To many open files" not being logged by master server when sync fails.

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 08:14:24 +0300: > Kenneth Miles wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:15 +1000: > > NOTE: "master server" is synced repository r0 property > > svn:sync-from-url and URL is svn://voyager-svn:3691/egm/QLD-Releases > > > > I was attempting a svnsync when th

Re: ISSUE: "To many open files" not being logged by master server when sync fails.

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Kenneth Miles wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 11:51:15 +1000: > NOTE: "master server" is synced repository r0 property > svn:sync-from-url and URL is svn://voyager-svn:3691/egm/QLD-Releases > > I was attempting a svnsync when the master server instance returned a > "abort-edit" because there was

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:11:34 +0200: > There is the list of issues on roadmap.html (currently 7 issues). But > a bit more accurate is simply querying the bug database for > component==libsvn_ra_serf. That currently shows 17 issues. Definitely > not all blockers, but certain

ISSUE: "To many open files" not being logged by master server when sync fails.

2012-05-02 Thread Kenneth Miles
NOTE: "master server" is synced repository r0 property svn:sync-from-url and URL is svn://voyager-svn:3691/egm/QLD-Releases I was attempting a svnsync when the master server instance returned a "abort-edit" because there was to many open files. The stack trace below is from the master server

Re: svn commit: r1333183 - in /subversion/branches/ev2-export/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_wc/node.c

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 4:10 PM, wrote: >... > +++ > subversion/branches/ev2-export/subversion/include/private/svn_wc_private.h > Wed May  2 20:10:23 2012 > @@ -1087,6 +1087,35 @@ svn_wc__node_pristine_install(svn_wc_con >                               const svn_checksum_t *md5_checksum, >      

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >... >> There is a single open issue that I believe warrants a fix for 1.8, and that >> is the HTTP/1.0 proxy work. That has been tested with a pre-release build of >> serf 1.1 for a new API

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On May 2, 2012 10:26 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote: >> >> Innocent bystander's question, before 1.8 starts to be cast in stone: >> what's the status of ra_serf? > > I've been using it exclusively for years. It has been totally fine. > >> Will we

Re: Rename tracking for merges

2012-05-02 Thread Alexey Neyman
Hi Stefan, Mind a couple of questions from potential user of this feature? On Tuesday, May 01, 2012 01:02:10 am Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > * "continue" from-path[@peg] [ from-rev ] to-path >Specifies that the merge-relevant change history >of from-path,from-rev is continued by to-path, >

subscribe

2012-05-02 Thread Moe, Mark
subscribe [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure un

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:57:00 -0400: >> Has anyone analyzed the ASF access logs to get an idea on the % of >> traffic from Serf vs. Neon or SVNKit? > > I think someone did a few years ago.  Anyway, help yourself: > > pe

Re: paths in diff output (possible bug)

2012-05-02 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:16:44PM +0100, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > > > I expected you'd get an "/directory/subdirectory@1 doesn't exist" error. > > I was the older (1.6) SVN behaviour > > Now "do {} while()" cycle in "diff_prepare_repos_repos" takes parent URL > until URL exists in both > star

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:57:00 -0400: > Has anyone analyzed the ASF access logs to get an idea on the % of > traffic from Serf vs. Neon or SVNKit? I think someone did a few years ago. Anyway, help yourself: people.apache.org:/x1/logarchive/eris/vc/2012/04

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> And if we go for ra_serf as the default, put much >> more effort into it to make it happen. Starting with agreeing on a set >> of requirements that we want to be satisfied before release, or >> something like that. > > Requirements are fixing t

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:45:20 -0400: > On May 2, 2012 10:26 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote: > > I'd hate for us to end up in the same > > difficult situation as with the 1.7 release: trying to make it the > > default but then realizing shortly before release that it isn't stable >

Re: Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Stein
On May 2, 2012 10:26 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" wrote: > > Innocent bystander's question, before 1.8 starts to be cast in stone: > what's the status of ra_serf? I've been using it exclusively for years. It has been totally fine. > Will we (again) attempt to make serf the > default in 1.8? It has bee

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Paul Burba wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:42:18 -0400: > And for some reason the spacing of ASCII diagram I posted in [2] is > wrong on svn.haxx.se, it's a lot easier to understand here: > svn.haxx.se gets the spacing correctly in the HTML source view, just not in the rendered view. (Also, the

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Paul Burba
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann > wrote: > > [snip] > >> The following pre-commit scripts / policies would be useful. >> >> * Common parts [not a policy] >>  We first check whether the commit contains a changed >>  svn:me

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: [snip] > The following pre-commit scripts / policies would be useful. > > * Common parts [not a policy] >  We first check whether the commit contains a changed >  svn:merge-info property. This limits the performance >  impact on non-merge

Re: svn ci performance issue with 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2012-05-02 Thread michael_rytting
Here are some quick benchmarks with our environment of the improvement the patch provides. 1.7.4 1.7.4-patch svn co 8m24s 4m8s svn st 13.3s 3.2s svn ci 1m31s 4.1s svn rm * 1.85s 6.3s svn revert 46.6s 4.0s Seems to me that the default behavior should be to ena

Status of ra_serf?

2012-05-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Innocent bystander's question, before 1.8 starts to be cast in stone: what's the status of ra_serf? Will we (again) attempt to make serf the default in 1.8? I know there have been some ra_serf bugfixes since 1.7, but there are certainly still some important open issues (not to mention unkown proble

mod_dontdothat gets pulled into 'make' even though httpd is not included in the build

2012-05-02 Thread Hans Lambermont
Hi devs, Head on trunk, mod_dontdothat gets pulled into 'make' even though httpd is not included in the build : Commands used : ./autogen.sh ./configure --with-apr=/usr/local/apr --with-apr-util=/usr/local/apr --with-apxs=no --with-ssl --with-neon=/usr --with-berkeley-db hmake ... tools/server-

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Johan Corveleyn writes: > >> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >>> Am 19.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Johan Corveleyn: - maybe propgetting through one of the bindings is much faster than through svnlook, and you i

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: >> Am 19.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Johan Corveleyn: >>> - maybe propgetting through one of the bindings is much faster than >>> through svnlook, and you intend for admins to set this up with some >>> language binding

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, May 02, 2012 at 12:20:35 +0200: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > > Am 19.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Johan Corveleyn: > > [snip] > > >> I haven't read your mail in detail yet, but just a note in passing: in > >> my experience (with a 1.5 serve

Re: Merge policies

2012-05-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Am 19.04.2012 14:03, schrieb Johan Corveleyn: [snip] >> I haven't read your mail in detail yet, but just a note in passing: in >> my experience (with a 1.5 server with FSFS-on-NFS backend) propgetting >> ('svnlook propget') every changed