Trying to enumerate ways to reduce build times.
Faster builds:
- export CONFIG_SHELL=/bin/sh (minimal sh preferred)
- out-of-tree build (i.e., run 'configure' in an empty dir), with the build
tree in a tmpfs
- disable unneeded components (eg, swig, bdb) when they're not needed
- pass '-q' to conf
Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 23:24:57 +0400:
> 2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf :
> > We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
> > a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
> > changes.
> >
> > Shall we roll 1.7.5 in two weeks fr
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 14.04.2012 23:46, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> > So I'll keep the first three version numbers the same in the future
>> for interim releases (in case I have to create one).
>> > But I guess if you want to improve the current situation, there's n
On 14.04.2012 23:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> So I'll keep the first three version numbers the same in the future
for interim releases (in case I have to create one).
> But I guess if you want to improve the current situation, there's not
much I can do.
>
Hyrum is suggesting we release 1.7.5, and
On Apr 14, 2012 4:46 PM, "Stefan Küng" wrote:
>
> On 14.04.2012 22:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Stefan Küng
wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14.04.2012 22:28, Greg Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a proposal:
>>> Skip several numbers and name the next release as "1.7.7".
>
On 14.04.2012 22:40, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 14.04.2012 22:28, Greg Stein wrote:
I have a proposal:
Skip several numbers and name the next release as "1.7.7".
Justification: to align with TortoiseSVN, which is 1.7.6 now.
There is a lot of
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 14.04.2012 22:28, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> I have a proposal:
> Skip several numbers and name the next release as "1.7.7".
>
> Justification: to align with TortoiseSVN, which is 1.7.6 now.
>
> There is a lot of "Subversi
On 14.04.2012 22:28, Greg Stein wrote:
I have a proposal:
Skip several numbers and name the next release as "1.7.7".
Justification: to align with TortoiseSVN, which is 1.7.6 now.
There is a lot of "Subversion exception!" threads on users@
where TortoiseSVN version is visible. For example [1].
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 16:15, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 14.04.2012 21:31, Blair Zajac wrote:
>>
>> On 4/14/12 12:24 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf:
We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
a few useful items merged already, an
On 14.04.2012 21:31, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 4/14/12 12:24 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf:
We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
changes.
Shall we roll 1.7.5 in two weeks
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 15:31, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 4/14/12 12:24 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> 2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf:
>>>
>>> We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
>>> a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
>>> changes.
>
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 4/14/12 12:24 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> 2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf:
>>>
>>> We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
>>> a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
>>> changes.
On 4/14/12 12:24 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf:
We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
changes.
Shall we roll 1.7.5 in two weeks from today? If we can clear STATUS and
2012/4/12 Daniel Shahaf :
> We released 1.6.18 today and 1.7.4 just over a month ago. There are
> a few useful items merged already, and STATUS has a truckload of pending
> changes.
>
> Shall we roll 1.7.5 in two weeks from today? If we can clear STATUS and
> roll next Thursday that's fine too, b
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:38:52PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.6.18.
>> >
>> [...]
>> >
>> > For this release, the f
In tracking down spurious coredumps we have in our custom RPC server, I found
one in svn_checksum__from_digest() due to bad input:
svn_checksum_t *
svn_checksum__from_digest(const unsigned char *digest,
svn_checksum_kind_t kind,
apr_pool_t *res
Good morning (in some parts of the world)!
I've been doing some poking around with Ev2 and copy operations on the
ev2-export branch, and have some observations which merit discussion.
In the working copy and elsewhere, all versioned nodes map to a
repos_relpath, and I've found it greatly simplifi
Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 15:32:04 +0200:
> I suppose in the future we should mark the .asc files as text instead
> of binary and set their eol-style to 'native'.
Agreed. r1326103
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:38:52PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.6.18.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > For this release, the following people have provided PGP signatures:
> >
> > C. Michae
19 matches
Mail list logo
