On 06.04.2012 00:38, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I've been also frustrated when considering the situation that occurs when a
> user changes his/her master password, forcing a re-encryption of all cached
> credentials using the new password.
You could do what whole-disk encryption systems do: only t
On 06.04.2012 01:10, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 18:38:37 -0400:
>> Is there anyone who is game for helping me tackle a new design for our
>> client-side authn cache using SQLite?
>>
> * danielsh raises hand
I can also offer ... ah, constructive criticism
On Apr 5, 2012 2:43 PM, wrote:
>
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Apr 5 18:43:20 2012
> New Revision: 1310005
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310005&view=rev
> Log:
> On the ev2-export branch:
> Use an Ev2-style driver to handle repos->repos copies.
>
> Part of this commit is rather bogus
On Apr 5, 2012 5:46 PM, wrote:
>
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Apr 5 21:45:42 2012
> New Revision: 1310085
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310085&view=rev
> Log:
> On the ev2-export branch:
> (this branch is going way beyond export, perhaps it should be renamed)
>
> Add svn_ra_get_comm
On Apr 5, 2012 6:39 PM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote:
>...
> Is there anyone who is game for helping me tackle a new design for our
> client-side authn cache using SQLite?
A little bit, sure.
>
> Should we also, then, attempt to redesign the whole of the auth provider
> system?
Preferable, if you'
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 20:18:38 -0400:
> If we don't find the bugfix doable, then I think we can/should add the
> check that I researched above.
>
+1
On Apr 5, 2012 4:16 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>...
> Yeah, the alternative is to do it at compile-time and disallow
> the `--with-berkeley-db --with-apxs=2.4' combination --- even for people
> who don't have BDB repositories.
Not sure about this; I think the get_resource() fix would be preferabl
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 18:38:37 -0400:
> Is there anyone who is game for helping me tackle a new design for our
> client-side authn cache using SQLite?
>
* danielsh raises hand
> Should we also, then, attempt to redesign the whole of the auth provider
> system? If not,
[ The following is pretty much stream-of-consciousness. Quite honestly, ]
[ if I could organize my thoughts well enough to craft a better email, I'd ]
[ probably not feel the need to write the mail so badly! ]
On the trunk, I have -- with vast amounts of help from gstein and d
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:48, Hyrum K Wright
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:15, wrote:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Apr 5 20:15:41 2012
New Revision: 1310047
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:48, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:15, wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Thu Apr 5 20:15:41 2012
>>> New Revision: 1310047
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310047&view=rev
>>> Log
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:15, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Thu Apr 5 20:15:41 2012
>> New Revision: 1310047
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310047&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * subversion/libsvn_ra/compat.c
>> (prev_log_path): Anot
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 16:15, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Apr 5 20:15:41 2012
> New Revision: 1310047
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1310047&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_ra/compat.c
> (prev_log_path): Another integer-width mismatch fix.
>
> Modified:
> subversion
I could have a shot at this but it's not at the top of my list.
(and I don't know Ruby either)
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 21:10:06 +0100:
> We discussed it last month:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
>
> Converting the lists to sets in the testsuite seems t
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 15:02:35 -0400:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
> >>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > Gre
Is that the final plan? If so, I'll *learn* enough Ruby to implement
it, just to get the bots quiet again. :P
-Hyrum
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> We discussed it last month:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
>
> Converting the lists to sets in the
We discussed it last month:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2012-03/0669.shtml
Converting the lists to sets in the testsuite seems to be the preferred
option, but I don't know enough Ruby to implement it.
Greg Stein writes:
> This is an ordering failure in the Ruby bindings, presumably due to
>
This is an ordering failure in the Ruby bindings, presumably due to
APR hash order.
Is anybody working on fixing the Ruby bindings to be order-independent
for cases like this?
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 15:00, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder svn-x64-ubuntu-gc
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:46, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
>>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>>> > > On Apr
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:21, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
>> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>> >
>> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>> > > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
>> wrote:
>> >
>>
Greg Stein writes:
> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>>
>> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
>> > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
> wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
>> >
>> > Can we at least implement a dete
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:14:53 -0400:
> On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >
> > Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> > > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 12:19:17 -0400:
> On 04/05/2012 11:26 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks
> > (reserved-checkout locks, that is)?
> >
> > I was talking to Philip and he mentioned that he'd been thinking about
> > th
On Apr 5, 2012 2:10 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> > On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin"
wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I've raised issue 4157 to track this problem.
> >
> > Can we at least implement a detection for this situation and fail
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 14:05:31 -0400:
> On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
> >
> > Branko Čibej writes:
> >
> > >> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
> > >> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
> > >
On Apr 5, 2012 6:46 AM, "Philip Martin" wrote:
>
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
> >> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
> >> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
> >> With the worker MPM the assertion always passes but with the event MP
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 16:26:15 +0100:
>> How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks
>> (reserved-checkout locks, that is)?
>>
>
> http://s.apache.org/xy-problem. Perhaps mod_dav_svn in slave/proxy mode
> s
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 16:26:15 +0100:
> How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks
> (reserved-checkout locks, that is)?
>
http://s.apache.org/xy-problem. Perhaps mod_dav_svn in slave/proxy mode
should learn to query the master for the existence of locks?
>
You need to mail dev-unsubscribe@ not dev@
Mark Therieau wrote on Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 12:55:33 -0400:
>
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> If we did have a way to sync locks, there would then be locks on the slave,
> and how would "svnsync sync" then make commits?
Just as a side-note, Mike has added in trunk new svnadmin lock/unlock commands:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view
Thanks. I've added the issue # and summary to the subject line now.
- Julian
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks
>> (reserved-checkout locks, that is)?
>>
>> I was talking to Philip and he mentioned that he'd been th
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 05.04.2012 17:35, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Hyrum K Wright
>>>
>>> I'm glad we've found a way to relegate this problem to a
>>> "minor...technicality."
>> So far no objections then.
>>
>> What's
On 05.04.2012 17:35, Ashod Nakashian wrote:
>>
>> From: Hyrum K Wright
>>
>> I'm glad we've found a way to relegate this problem to a
>> "minor...technicality."
> So far no objections then.
>
> What's the preferred mode of operation in such a case?
>
> I can updat
On 04/05/2012 11:26 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks
> (reserved-checkout locks, that is)?
>
> I was talking to Philip and he mentioned that he'd been thinking about
> this. It seems to us that the only way available currently is for
> post-[un]
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Subversion-1.6.18 tarballs are now available for testing/signing by
> committers. To obtain them please check out a working copy from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>
> Please add your signatures to the .asc
>
> From: Hyrum K Wright
>
>I'm glad we've found a way to relegate this problem to a
>"minor...technicality."
So far no objections then.
What's the preferred mode of operation in such a case?
I can update the proposal and start sending patches for the dev-list t
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> I'm pleased to be able to say that as of this weekend we can welcome
>>> three more people -- Stefan Fuhrmann and Cristian Camerin and Oleksiy
>>> Suschuk [...]
>>
>> Welcome aboard!
>
> Correction: it's "Cristian Amarie" (IRC name: camerin).
Correction 2: it's
How would an admin arrange for svnsync to synchronize locks (reserved-checkout
locks, that is)?
I was talking to Philip and he mentioned that he'd been thinking about this.
It seems to us that the only way available currently is for post-[un]lock on
the master to rsync the whole 'locks' direc
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> [Managing uncompressed copies of files] is certainly a -minor-
>> complication we'll have to deal with. It's just a technicality,
>
> That's great, because I believe that is the only significant issue that needs
> to be
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
>> I'm pleased to be able to say that as of this weekend we can welcome
>> three more people -- Stefan Fuhrmann and Cristian Camerin and Oleksiy
>> Suschuk [...]
>
> Welcome aboard!
Correction: it's "Cristian Amarie" (IRC name: camerin).
- Julian
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I agree with making svn_wc__pristine_*() smarter and I disagree with
> teaching svn the proper mount(8) flags for all platforms APR supports.
Me too. (Note: I never said svn should mount filesystems, I just said it would
be interesting to investigate.)
Ashod Nakashian wr
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 23:54, Greg Stein wrote:
>> >
>> >Daniel
>> >(devil's advocate mode)
>
> Given Daniel's devil's advocate position, I say just ignore him. Don't feed
> him :-)
>
> My vote is compress for files > N bytes (and store on disk), and stick the
> others into a new pristine.db. Mayb
Branko Čibej writes:
>> ... I think I may have identified the problem. The patch below checks
>> that the error struct is allocated and released by the same thread.
>> With the worker MPM the assertion always passes but with the event MPM I
>> get assertion failures. I don't fully understand th
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 18:09:19 +0100:
>>> For comments, please:
>>> [[[Tweak the recently introduced svn_stringbuf_create_empty() function.
>>>
>>> Unlike with svn_string_create_empty() which produces an immutable
>>> string
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Julian Foad wrote on Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 18:09:19 +0100:
For comments, please:
[[[Tweak the recently introduced svn_stringbuf_create_empty() function.
Unlike with svn_string_create_empty() which produces an immutable
string, the resulting string buffer is often going to ha
46 matches
Mail list logo
