how do I get off this list?
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.4.
>
> This is a maintenance release which fixes known problems and
> regressions in the 1.7.x line of releases. We encourage users
> to upgrade as soon
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 15:39, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 03:02 PM, gst...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Thu Mar 8 20:02:24 2012
>> New Revision: 1298548
>
> Do my eyes deceive, or did Greg Stein just introduce a usage of the accursed
> [define] EZT syntax? ;-)
*grum
On 03/08/2012 03:02 PM, gst...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Thu Mar 8 20:02:24 2012
> New Revision: 1298548
Do my eyes deceive, or did Greg Stein just introduce a usage of the accursed
[define] EZT syntax? ;-)
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distribut
Way ahead of you :-) r1298552
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 15:09, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Since much of this content is autogenerated from
> tools/dist/templates/download.ezt, you should probably update it, too.
>
> -Hyrum
>
> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Thu Mar
Since much of this content is autogenerated from
tools/dist/templates/download.ezt, you should probably update it, too.
-Hyrum
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Thu Mar 8 20:02:24 2012
> New Revision: 1298548
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1298548&view=
Go forward, this should be easier after r1298548 and r1298552.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 14:18, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Thu Mar 8 19:18:13 2012
> New Revision: 1298522
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1298522&view=rev
> Log:
> * publish/download/download.html: Ooops, forgot to updat
I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.4.
This is a maintenance release which fixes known problems and
regressions in the 1.7.x line of releases. We encourage users
to upgrade as soon as reasonable.
Please choose the mirror closest to you by visiting:
http://subversion.ap
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:03:47PM +, sebb wrote:
> >> >> > 1)
> >> >> > svnmucc -m logmsg -U https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/ \
> >> >> > mv dev/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2 \
> >> >> > release/subversion/subversion-1.7.4.tar.bz2 \
> >> >> > mv d
Alexey Neyman wrote:
>> "If TARGET_WCPATH is omitted, a default value of '.' is assumed.
>> However, in the special case where both sources refer to a file node
>> with the same basename and a similarly named file is also found within
>> '.', the differences will be applied
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 12:36:11PM +, Julian Foad wrote:
> I didn't test 1.7.3, but after testing 1.7.4 I compared its installation
> directory with 1.7.2 and noticed that lib/apache2/modules/ now contains
> mod_dontdothat.so.
> It is installed by "make install" and not by "make install-too
I didn't test 1.7.3, but after testing 1.7.4 I compared its installation
directory with 1.7.2 and noticed that lib/apache2/modules/ now contains
mod_dontdothat.so.
The change was made in 1.7.3. CHANGES: "General: ship mod_dontdothat with the
standard release".
Log message:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 07:33:03 +0100:
> On 08.03.2012 02:13, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> >>Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 1:28
> >>To: Stefan Fuhrmann
> >>Cc: Subversion Development
> >>Subject: Re:
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: svn-r...@apache.org [mailto:svn-r...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 5:01
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1298264 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ STATUS
>> subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c
>>
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Subversion-1.7.4 tarballs are now available for testing/signing [...]
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix).
Tested:
[ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]
swig-py
swig-pl
swig-rb
ctypes-python
(I also built javahl, but couldn't get its tests
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:38:16 +0100:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: svn-r...@apache.org [mailto:svn-r...@apache.org]
> > Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 5:01
> > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: svn commit: r1298264 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: .
> -Original Message-
> From: svn-r...@apache.org [mailto:svn-r...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 8 maart 2012 5:01
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1298264 - in /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ STATUS
> subversion/libsvn_wc/props.c
>
> Author: svn-role
> Date: Thu
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
> * undo the above-mentioned revs on /trunk
Good. I was starting to have concerns about other races in the current
code. For example:
- first process reads generation file N
- second process writes new revprops
- first process reads revprops
- second process wri
Hi,
On 08.03.2012 02:13, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>> And this shared mem approach will work with both threaded as well as
>>> multi-process servers?
>>> If so, this sounds like a good plan to me.
>> This still assumes that the repository is only used by a single
>> machine, while using NFS paths wit
18 matches
Mail list logo
