Re: svn commit: r1296604 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs: caching.c fs.h fs_fs.c

2012-03-03 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:31 AM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Mar  3 11:31:17 2012 > New Revision: 1296604 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296604&view=rev > Log: > Certain operations, e.g. svn ls, will contain timestamp and author > information from many different revisions.  A

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 March 2012 12:48, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> sebb wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:30:53 +: >>> On 3 March 2012 09:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> > Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500: >>> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Dani

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread sebb
On 3 March 2012 12:48, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > sebb wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:30:53 +: >> On 3 March 2012 09:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500: >> >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> >> >>> The release tarballs

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
sebb wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:30:53 +: > On 3 March 2012 09:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500: > >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> >> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the > >> >> >

link error with 1.7.3

2012-03-03 Thread rupert.thurner
hi, is there anything in the subversion build script(s) which enforces a location "lib/svn", instead of only "lib" ? opencsw solaris packages have all the libraries in /opt/csw/lib. if we set the flags to it with: SVNLIB = $(prefix)/lib ... CONFIGURE_ARGS = $(DIRPATHS) --libdir=$(SVNLIB) --l

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread sebb
On 3 March 2012 09:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500: >> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the >> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository a

RE: svn commit: r1296045 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c

2012-03-03 Thread Bert Huijben
This is per design: the commit editor has to match the repository layout, while the working copy van be switched. One of the pieces that makes the commit code in libsvn_client hard to understand. For updates we tell the server the client layout, which makes things much easier in the editor. Bert

Re: svn commit: r1296586 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c

2012-03-03 Thread Greg Stein
Ah! Not "misplaced", but "does not apply". That makes more sense. >From your log msg, I thought you meant "this docstring shouldn't be *here*. it should go *there*." ... and so I was confused because there is never a "there" for a static function. Thx, -g On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:29, Daniel Sha

Re: svn commit: r1296586 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c

2012-03-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
In short: the docstring was removed because it didn't belong to the function it was placed next to. (and I couldn't find the function it did belong to) Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:26:43 +0200: > On some other static function, which implements the svn_hash_diff_func_t > interfac

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:20:33 -0500: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the > >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository across to the > >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repo

Re: svn commit: r1296586 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c

2012-03-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On some other static function, which implements the svn_hash_diff_func_t interface and takes formal parameters named BATON and KEY. Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 04:00:16 -0500: > Huh? That is a static function. Where else would the doc string go? > On Mar 3, 2012 3:28 AM, wrote: > >

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 04:02, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository across to the >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/ repository. >> >>> << >> >>> >> >>> I've tr

Re: Question on release process - making release public by svn move

2012-03-03 Thread Daniel Shahaf
> >>> The release tarballs and signatures can be svn mv'ed from the > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ repository across to the > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/httpd/ repository. > >>> << > >>> > >>> I've tried using svn mv directly on a test repo (i.e. not using a

Re: svn commit: r1296586 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c

2012-03-03 Thread Greg Stein
Huh? That is a static function. Where else would the doc string go? On Mar 3, 2012 3:28 AM, wrote: > Author: danielsh > Date: Sat Mar 3 08:27:59 2012 > New Revision: 1296586 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296586&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c > (handle_exte