Yes, your revision touches svnsync_tests.py but the patch is to svntest/main.py
Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 19:55:13 -0500:
> Looks like this got pulled out in a later STATUS update. I'm assuming
> the group merges fine without my change?
>
> (it may be handy to merge anyways, to avo
Couldn't you just make a Posix-specific test for pattern=* testing?
That would give us at least *some* testing coverage for it.
Cheers,
-g
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:40, wrote:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Tue Feb 28 13:40:20 2012
> New Revision: 1294646
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?re
Looks like this got pulled out in a later STATUS update. I'm assuming
the group merges fine without my change?
(it may be handy to merge anyways, to avoid potential future merge conflicts)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:43, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Tue Feb 28 10:43:21 2012
> New Revision:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 15:25, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: j...@apache.org [mailto:j...@apache.org]
>> Sent: dinsdag 28 februari 2012 20:18
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r1294796 - /subversion/trunk/COMMITTERS
>>
>> Author: joes
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: j...@apache.org [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 28 februari 2012 20:18
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1294796 - /subversion/trunk/COMMITTERS
>
> Author: joes
> Date: Tue Feb 28 19:17:52 2012
> New Revision: 1294796
>
> U
On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. People will be using
Java 7 to attempt to build the JavaHL bindings, so I think it makes
sense to use them on our tests. In fact, this entire thi
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. People will be using
> Java 7 to attempt to build the JavaHL bindings, so I think it makes
> sense to use them on our tests. In fact, this entire thing was
> motivated by the fact that I upgra
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 2/27/12 8:34 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>>
>> On 2/27/12 8:32 PM, hwri...@apache.org wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Tue Feb 28 04:32:21 2012
>>> New Revision: 1294455
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294455&view=rev
>>>
Update: now the swig-py build is failing. :(
It looks like the generated code isn't pulling in a required header
file or something, which causes the bindings build to fail with swig
2.0.4. I've temporarily disabled the python bindings on that bot to
get stuff running again.
-Hyrum
On Mon, Feb 2
Hi,
On IRC, the idea of a command to explicitly purge all caches came up, which I
rephrase here so it does not get lost.
The idea is that when a corrupt repository is replaced by a backup "in place",
the contents of the backup might be slightly outdated (the latest revisions are
missing), and
danie...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 13:27:28 -:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Mon Feb 27 13:27:28 2012
> New Revision: 1294147
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294147&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix the issue found by r1294134: svnserve and mod_dav_svn expect different
> syntaxes in
danie...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:23:29 -:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Tue Feb 28 06:23:28 2012
> New Revision: 1294479
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294479&view=rev
> Log:
> Check for issue #4129 (bogus predecessor fields in the root node-revision) in
> 'svnadmi
I guess that actually attaching the patch file is a good idea, in general. :-)
Grüße,
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Markus Schaber [mailto:m.scha...@3s-software.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 28. Februar 2012 09:25
An: Subversion Dev (dev@subversion.apache.org)
Betreff: AW: Conflict o
Hi, Daniel,
The mismatching commend sneaked in because I copied the test case above as a
start of my test. :-(
I just was about to add a patch for the 2 README files to clarify the issues,
and just noticed that phurba already committed a text explaining when to assign
an issue, and how to mark
14 matches
Mail list logo
