Hi,
I'm going through some crash reports sent for TSVN and I found a crash
that happens when committing, and the wc has some incomplete entries:
libsvn_wc/node.c, svn_wc__internal_get_origin().
SVN_ERR(svn_wc__db_scan_addition(&status, &op_root_abspath, NULL,
N
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 16:44, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Feb 21 21:44:13 2012
>> New Revision: 1292047
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1292047&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Ev2 shims: Register the appropriate callbacks for use w
Mario Brandt wrote on Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 19:32:03 +0100:
> Hi Daniel,
> > (At the time of this writing, httpd-2.4.1 is not blessed as GA.)
>
> It was, but the announcement was out that time. However not it is released ;-)
>
It wasn't on the download page yet. I'm not going to split hairs as t
On 02/22/2012 01:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I think we should be able to ship those fixes during the first or
> second week of March. This would mean starting the release train
> at the end of next week, and trying to get a decent amount of voting
> to happen throughout next week.
>
> I would
Hi Daniel,
> (At the time of this writing, httpd-2.4.1 is not blessed as GA.)
It was, but the announcement was out that time. However not it is released ;-)
> Are you sure your compiler's include path (-I flags) is correct, and not
> picking up any httpd-2.x headers?
I'm sure I picked up the r
Given that Hryum has been asking us all to help him out with making
releases, I suppose we could try to take advantage of the load being
spread among more than, er... one person, and issue patch releases
in a slighly more frequent basis.
Here are the release dates of 1.7.x releases issued so far:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Paul Burba writes:
>
>> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c
>> ===
>> --- subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c (revision 1292379)
>> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c (work
Paul Burba writes:
> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c
> ===
> --- subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c (revision 1292379)
> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c (working copy)
> @@ -1519,6 +1519,17 @@
> ctx->notify_baton
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> Even with this fix I'm still seeing odd behavior post-copy (the
> following example uses a WC-to-WC copy, but the same problem occurs
> with a URL-to-WC copy):
.
.
> To fix this we need to remove the external via the OS then update to
> restor
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 22 februari 2012 17:42
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Cc: Philip Martin; C. Michael Pilato; Subversion Development; Alexey 0
> Moudrick; us...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Issue report: subversion 1.7.2
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Paul Burba writes:
>>
>>> I'm able to replicate this failure on my Windows box with my own
>>> builds of trunk@1245285, 1.7.0 and 1.7.3. Alexey's script works as
>>> expected
Mark Phippard writes:
> Just to clarify. I had two Terminal windows open. In one of them, I
> was in the /branches/2.3.x folder and ran svn up.
>
> In the other, I was in the /trunk folder and ran svn up. This is the
> one that failed and the error message said:
>
> svn: E155004: Working copy
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>>> Update a different subtree:
>>>
>>> $ svn up wc/X/Y/Z
>>> Updating 'wc/X/Y/Z':
>>> A wc/X/Y/Z/Q
>>> Updated to revision 4.
>>
>> This does not work for me. I have an entire repository checked out
>> and started an update in my /branche
Mark Phippard writes:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> That's not correct. Start and hold an update:
>>
>> $ gdb -arg subversion/svn/.libs/lt-svn up wc/A/B/C
>> (gdb) b update_editor.c:close_directory
>> (gdb) r
>> Breakpoint 2 at 0x778eee2f
>>
>> Run status:
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 22 februari 2012 14:53
> To: Philip Martin
> Cc: Branko Čibej; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AW: SQLite locking for WCNG on NFS
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Mark Phippard writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> The user has more information than the application can ever have. If
>>> the user wants to be able to run two subtree updates in parallel then
>>> exlu
Mark Phippard writes:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> The user has more information than the application can ever have. If
>> the user wants to be able to run two subtree updates in parallel then
>> exlusive locking must not be enabled. If the user wants to run sta
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> The user has more information than the application can ever have. If
> the user wants to be able to run two subtree updates in parallel then
> exlusive locking must not be enabled. If the user wants to run status
> during an update then exc
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Simon Butler wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>>
>> Branko Čibej writes:
>>
>> > On 20.02.2012 09:51, Markus Schaber wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> What about an "-exclusive" general option to the svn command line
>> >> client, w
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>
> > On 20.02.2012 09:51, Markus Schaber wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> What about an "-exclusive" general option to the svn command line
> client, which triggers exclusive wc access for that specific command
> invocation /
> -Original Message-
> From: stef...@apache.org [mailto:stef...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 25 december 2011 1:56
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1223036 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c
>
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Dec 25 00:56:28 2011
Hi,
To preserve the results of the discussion just taking place on IRC, here my
(personal) summary:
- There should be a config option to include additional SQL statements on
SQLite database creation. This could be used for fine-tuning like "PRAGMA
page_size". This could be for both client (wc.
Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
>Branko Čibej writes:
>
>> On 20.02.2012 09:51, Markus Schaber wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> What about an "-exclusive" general option to the svn command line client,
>>> which triggers exclusive wc access fo
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 20.02.2012 09:51, Markus Schaber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What about an "-exclusive" general option to the svn command line client,
>> which triggers exclusive wc access for that specific command invocation /
>> session?
>
> And you expect users to know when to use it, and
24 matches
Mail list logo
