Re: backport.pl

2012-01-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 25.01.2012 22:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved > STATUS entries in 15 seconds by pressing 'y' three times. > (Reference: r1235925:r1235929 and r1213744:r1213747.) > > At this point I wonder how this could be made more efficient. Options >

Re: svn commit: r1235831 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c

2012-01-25 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 13:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 19:26:33 +0200: >... >> Same fix to ra_neon please? >> >> svn_ra_neon__open() > > Greg replied on IRC --- basically that he won't maintain ra_neon and > thinks that library should be given a one-way t

backport.pl

2012-01-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Using tools/dist/backport.pl, I can fully process 3-4 approved STATUS entries in 15 seconds by pressing 'y' three times. (Reference: r1235925:r1235929 and r1213744:r1213747.) At this point I wonder how this could be made more efficient. Options include: - Converting people who merge/commit backp

Re: 1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and > STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a > 1.7.3 release.  It's been a couple of months since 1.7.2, so it > appears that a 1.7.3 should come soon

Re: 1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright >>> wrote: >>> > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and >>> > STATUS there are number of items which could pot

Re: 1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 22:05, Bert Huijben wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright >> wrote: >> > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and >> > STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a >> > 1.7.3 release.  It's been a couple

Re: svn commit: r1235831 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c

2012-01-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 19:26:33 +0200: > gst...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 17:15:05 -: > > Author: gstein > > Date: Wed Jan 25 17:15:05 2012 > > New Revision: 1235831 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1235831&view=rev > > Log: > > Improve the hand

RE: 1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 18:57 > To: Hyrum K Wright > Cc: Subversion Development > Subject: Re: 1.7.3 next week-ish? > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright > wrote: > > This mail is very non-com

Re: 1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and > STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a > 1.7.3 release.  It's been a couple of months since 1.7.2, so it > appears that a 1.7.3 should come soo

1.7.3 next week-ish?

2012-01-25 Thread Hyrum K Wright
This mail is very non-committal, but from the looks of CHANGES and STATUS there are number of items which could potentially make up a 1.7.3 release. It's been a couple of months since 1.7.2, so it appears that a 1.7.3 should come sooner rather than later. Perhaps sometime next week would be reaso

Re: svn commit: r1235831 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util.c

2012-01-25 Thread Daniel Shahaf
gst...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 17:15:05 -: > Author: gstein > Date: Wed Jan 25 17:15:05 2012 > New Revision: 1235831 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1235831&view=rev > Log: > Improve the handle of the ssl-authority-files config option: allow > leading and trailing wh

[PATCH] Fix a bug with property validation logic during 'svnadmin load'

2012-01-25 Thread vijay
Hi, This patch fixes a bug in a helper function subversion/libsvn_repos/load-fs-vtable.c:change_rev_prop() to use property validation functions if 'validate_props' is 'TRUE'. As "svnadmin load" does the property validation by default, 'validate_props' parameter is always set to 'TRUE'. Update

Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes the unversioned 'MissingItem' from disk)?

2012-01-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: [ ... ] > The 'svn rm' case that opened this thread was the first case where libsvn_wc > would be involved and this opens the door to many other changes. > If we change svn rm, then it no longer matches 'svn revert' for these cases. Actually

Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes the unversioned 'MissingItem' from disk)?

2012-01-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] >> Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 1:48 >> To: Julian Foad >> Cc: Subversion Development; Bert Huijben; Philip Martin >> Subject: Re: How to fix issue #4023 (o

Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes the unversioned 'MissingItem' from disk)?

2012-01-25 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 24.01.2012 15:15, Philip Martin wrote: >> Daniel Shahaf writes: >>   Given three files "foo", "FOO" and "Foo", one in   wc.db, one on disk and one on the command line, is that the same file? My understanding is that a W

RE: Subversion working Copy on Substituted Drive

2012-01-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Karl Heinz Marbaise [mailto:khmarba...@gmx.de] > Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 10:44 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion working Copy on Substituted Drive > > Hi, > > after a good hint via IRC now a original failure message: > > Sendi

Re: Subversion working Copy on Substituted Drive

2012-01-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, sorry i forgot to mention the SVN Client version... I have tested this with svn command line client 1.6.17 ...on Windows Vista Enterprise SP 1, 32 Bit ... Kind regards Karl Heinz Marbaise -- SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung SchulungTel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893 Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Mar

Re: Subversion working Copy on Substituted Drive

2012-01-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, after a good hint via IRC now a original failure message: Sending X://test.txt Transmitting file data .svn: Commit succeeded, but other errors follow: svn: Error bumpung revision post-commit (details follow): svn: In Directory 'X:' svn: Log entry missing 'name' attribute (entry 'rm' for dire

Subversion working Copy on Substituted Drive

2012-01-25 Thread Karl Heinz Marbaise
Hi, i have observed a strange thing on a windows machine I have substituted a working copy with a drive in Windows (subst)... lets say working copy on D:\wc\test-checkout now i done a subst X: D:\wc\test-checkout... If i try to do a checkin in the root of the X: drive X:\ i got messages

RE: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes the unversioned 'MissingItem' from disk)?

2012-01-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: woensdag 25 januari 2012 1:48 > To: Julian Foad > Cc: Subversion Development; Bert Huijben; Philip Martin > Subject: Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' > deletes the unversioned 'Miss

Re: How to fix issue #4023 (on Windows, 'svn rm missingItem' deletes the unversioned 'MissingItem' from disk)?

2012-01-25 Thread Branko Čibej
On 24.01.2012 15:15, Philip Martin wrote: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > >>> Given three files "foo", "FOO" and "Foo", one in >>> wc.db, one on disk and one on the command line, is that the same file? >>> >>> My understanding is that a Windows user expects those to be the same >>> file. So "svn st