Trent Nelson wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:56:27 -0800:
> [[[
> Improve docstrings for svn_delta_editor_t's absent_(file|directory) callbacks.
>
Trent was on IRC so I've applied a slightly modified version in r1229896
which he provided there.
Trent: for greppability please don't abbreviate fu
Trent Nelson wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 20:56:27 -0800:
> Howdy folks,
>
Hi!
> The current wording of svn_delta_editor_t's absent_(file|directory)
> callback functions is a bit misleading:
>
> "In the (file|directory) ... but cannot be conveyed to the
> consumer (per
Howdy folks,
The current wording of svn_delta_editor_t's absent_(file|directory)
callback functions is a bit misleading:
"In the (file|directory) ... but cannot be conveyed to the
consumer (perhaps because of authorization restrictions)."
^^^
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: dinsdag 10 januari 2012 17:36
>> To: Bert Huijben
>> Cc: Subversion Development; Stefan Küng
>> Subject: Re: Crash when updating
>
>
>> if (! from_val
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Esponda wrote:
> (Note: I'm "almost" sure this is something to be fixed for 1.7, being
> the reason why I'm also addressing this to the Dev list... feel free
> to correct me if I'm wrong.. Thanks)
Please don't crosspost to both lists, try to pick the cor
2012/1/8 Paweł Sikora :
> Hi,
>
> i've noticed that a new subversion-1.7.2 can't reintegrate a trivial branch.
Hi Paweł,
This isn't really a bug and it isn't limited to reintegrate merges.
Explanation follows below.
> attached script produces on svn-1.5.2 following correct results:
>
> $ ./merge
Probably an old shoe to everyone else, but here's some benchmarking blogpost
I hadn't seen yet:
http://blog.polarion.com/archives/1728
Featuring an SVN-branded race car! :)
~Neels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Burba [mailto:ptbu...@gmail.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 10 januari 2012 17:36
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Subversion Development; Stefan Küng
> Subject: Re: Crash when updating
> if (! from_val) /* adding a new property */
> SVN_ERR(apply_single_pr
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:14 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Merging would be simpler if the user didn't have to think about doing the
> "keep-alive dance" after a reintegrate [1].
>
> I'm trying to teach the sync merge to detect when a reintegrate has been
> done, so that we could avoid the need for r4
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 10 januari 2012 17:34
> To: Manfred Klug
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Access Violation with 'svn status -u'
>
> "Manfred Klug" writes:
>
> > svn st -u
> > ==> Access Violati
Philip Martin writes:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> svnadmin create repo
>> svn import -mm repo/format file://$PWD/repo/A/f
>> svn co -r0 file://$PWD/repo wc
>> svn mkdir wc/A
>> svn st -u wc
>>
>> That's obviously a bug. It's crashing in make_file_baton:
>>
>> f->repos_relpath = svn_relpath_j
Philip Martin writes:
> svnadmin create repo
> svn import -mm repo/format file://$PWD/repo/A/f
> svn co -r0 file://$PWD/repo wc
> svn mkdir wc/A
> svn st -u wc
>
> That's obviously a bug. It's crashing in make_file_baton:
>
> f->repos_relpath = svn_relpath_join(find_dir_repos_relpath(pb, pool)
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> From a crash report dump sent for TSVN for an update the attached stack
>> trace happened.
>>
>> libsvn_wc\props.c, svn_wc__merge_props()
>> to_val = incoming_change->value
>>
"Manfred Klug" writes:
> svn st -u
> ==> Access Violation
Simplified recipe:
svnadmin create repo
svn import -mm repo/format file://$PWD/repo/A/f
svn co -r0 file://$PWD/repo wc
svn mkdir wc/A
svn st -u wc
That's obviously a bug. It's crashing in make_file_baton:
f->repos_relpath = svn_relp
Hi,
I think the recipe should be obvious. Feel free to ask if you have any
questions.
svn --version
svn, version 1.7.2 (r1207936)
compiled Dec 16 2011, 16:46:58
Copyright (C) 2011 The Apache Software Foundation.
This software consists of contributions made by many people; see the NOTICE
fil
(Note: I'm "almost" sure this is something to be fixed for 1.7, being
the reason why I'm also addressing this to the Dev list... feel free
to correct me if I'm wrong.. Thanks)
Hello there,
We are facing the following issue with svn 1.7:
Exec summary:
- We need to incrementally checkout a multi-G
16 matches
Mail list logo