Daniel Shahaf :
> Eric S. Raymond wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:20:16 -0500:
> > 2. In interpreting a Node record which has both a copyfrom source and
> > a property section, it is possible that the copy source node itself
> > has a property section. How are they to be combined?
>
> "The copy
Greg Stein :
> *shrug* ... the reason people aren't getting around to answering your
> question is because we don't credit individuals like that, anywhere in the
> project. In most cases, we *remove* credits, and just rely on the version
> control history if a need to know ever arises. Otherwise, t
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:52:08PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Ranting is all very well, but I've yet to hear a suggestion from you
> about how the libraries should handle unrecoverable errors. Like, for
> example, the case where wc.db contains inconsistent and/or invalid data.
It's already been
On 23.12.2011 18:49, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 23.12.2011 15:18, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 14:50, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23
On Dec 23, 2011 3:20 PM, "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>...
> Still looking for answers to this:
>
> 1. In the Credits section I note that portions of this document are
> derived from notes by Ben Collins-Sussman, and mention the people who
> have helpfully answered questions. I would also like to cre
Eric S. Raymond wrote on Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 19:26:15 -0500:
> Stephen Butler :
> >[various observations, ending with...]
> > There's also the phenomenon of "evil twins", where an item is replaced
> > when it should have been changed. Arbitrarily breaking the flow
> > causes problems because th
Eric S. Raymond wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 15:20:16 -0500:
> 2. In interpreting a Node record which has both a copyfrom source and
> a property section, it is possible that the copy source node itself
> has a property section. How are they to be combined?
>
"The copy source node" is dereferen
Daniel Shahaf :
> If you haven't received it, follow up by mail to r...@apache.org.
I have done so.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 15:20, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I haven't received any notification about an apache.org account. Did I
> miss some mail, or are things just slow because of the holidays?
You should have received a mail from r...@apache.org 72 hours and 22 minutes
ago.
If you haven't rec
I haven't received any notification about an apache.org account. Did I
miss some mail, or are things just slow because of the holidays?
In the 0.5 draft, I asked:
>2. Does a copy operation carry with it properties? In particular,
>if I do a replace on a file without the svn:executable property
On 23.12.2011 15:18, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 14:50, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 13:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Dec 2
Finally got around to updating the C API docs for 1.7 in r1222703.
-Hyrum
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> I can handle them, if you wish.
>
> For future reference, 'make doc-api' builds the C docs, 'make
> doc-javahl' builds the JavaHL docs, and 'make doc' builds them bo
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:25:37AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:40:59AM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> > I would say that URL and UUID should be enough.
>
> The repos_id is useful information for developers trying to help users
> with debugging the issue. The mess
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 04:10:07PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 14:50, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 13:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:18PM +0200, D
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 14:50, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 13:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > > s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 02:26:40PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 13:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 00:35:16 -:
> > > > + An informative error message h
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011, at 13:01, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 00:35:16 -:
> > > + An informative error message helps people more than an assert (which
> > > + in case of TSVN can
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:48:18PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 00:35:16 -:
> > + An informative error message helps people more than an assert (which
> > + in case of TSVN can mean crashing the Windows Explorer).
>
> I thought the svn_err
s...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 00:35:16 -:
> + An informative error message helps people more than an assert (which
> + in case of TSVN can mean crashing the Windows Explorer).
I thought the svn_error_malfunction_handler_t stuff addressed that issue?
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:40:59AM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/12/23 Hyrum K Wright :
> > Yikes! I think this wins the prize for "longest function call".
> > Perhaps a helper function or at least some temporary variables would
> > be in order?
I look into that, sure.
> I would say t
20 matches
Mail list logo
