Re: 1.7.2 up for testing / signing

2011-12-02 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > As promised, the 1.7.2 tarballs are up for testing and signing: > http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.2/ > > The magic rev is r1207936, and as usual please post signatures here: > http://work.hyrumwright.org/pub/svn/collect_sigs.py >

Re: [PATCH] RETRY: Patch to update the Binary Package download page with client-only, no-registration option

2011-12-02 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Andy Singleton wrote: >  The proposed links are not duplicates. If that is true, then I do not object. When I looked at your page before, it seemed that it was linking directly to WanDisco for the downloads. Are you saying that they are making special client-onl

Re: [PATCH] RETRY: Patch to update the Binary Package download page with client-only, no-registration option

2011-12-02 Thread Branko Čibej
On 02.12.2011 15:21, Andy Singleton wrote: > The proposed links are not duplicates. 90% of users by count will > want the client only, with no registration, which is what these links > provide. WANdisco's distributions combine the client and server. I stand corrected. In that case, +1 to apply

Re: [PATCH] RETRY: Patch to update the Binary Package download page with client-only, no-registration option

2011-12-02 Thread Andy Singleton
The proposed links are not duplicates. 90% of users by count will want the client only, with no registration, which is what these links provide. WANdisco's distributions combine the client and server. Collabnet's links require registration. As an aside, users are also going to want update

Re: [PATCH] RETRY: Patch to update the Binary Package download page with client-only, no-registration option

2011-12-02 Thread Mark Phippard
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Andy Singleton wrote: > I am submitting this patch because the other client links available - from > Collabnet, YOUR EMPLOYER - require registration.  That creates a bad and > manipulative user experience.  You can fix it by adding these links.  Or, > you can remov

RE: 1.7.2 up for testing / signing

2011-12-02 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com] > Sent: dinsdag 29 november 2011 19:33 > To: Subversion Development > Subject: 1.7.2 up for testing / signing > > As promised, the 1.7.2 tarballs are up for testing and signing: > http://people.apache.org/~hwr

Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions

2011-12-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Recorded this as http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4072 C. Michael Pilato wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 14:41:53 -0500: > On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be > > committed), but I suppose there i

Re: [BUG+PATCH] Repository "corruption" when committing several versions of a huge file

2011-12-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 17:26:36 +0200: > I'll commit your patch and nominate it for backport to 1.7.3. While > at it I'll also scan the code for similar problems. (Haven't got to it yet, but still planning to...)

Re: [PATCH] RETRY: Patch to update the Binary Package download page with client-only, no-registration option

2011-12-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andy Singleton wrote on Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 17:38:32 -0500: > [[[ > Index: packages.html > === > --- packages.html(revision 1208468) > +++ packages.html(working copy) > @@ -96,6 +96,12 @@ > > ]]] > Index: packages.html > ===