Re: svn commit: r1207663 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py

2011-11-28 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:12:38PM -0600, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Philip Martin > wrote: > > s...@apache.org writes: > > > >> Author: stsp > >> Date: Mon Nov 28 22:34:49 2011 > >> New Revision: 1207663 > > > >> +def patch_target_no_eol_at_eof(sbox): > >> +  "patch

Re: svn_delta_path_driver(), its purpose and future

2011-11-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
The docs seem pretty clear to me: svn_delta_path_driver() produces a depth- first editor traversal, where for each PATH in PATHS the portion in-and- below PATH is handled by the callback (including the open_*() or add_*() calls for PATH itself), and the portion of opening/closing the parent and anc

[l10n] Translation status report for trunk r1207746

2011-11-28 Thread Subversion Translation Status
Translation status report for trunk@r1207746 lang trans untrans fuzzy obs -- de2071 170 344 269 UUooo es1997 244 370 404 ++UUU~ fr2239 2

Re: svn commit: r1207663 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py

2011-11-28 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > s...@apache.org writes: > >> Author: stsp >> Date: Mon Nov 28 22:34:49 2011 >> New Revision: 1207663 > >> +def patch_target_no_eol_at_eof(sbox): >> +  "patch target with no eol at eof" >> + >> +  sbox.build() >> +  wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir >> + >

Re: svn commit: r1207663 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_diff/parse-diff.c tests/cmdline/patch_tests.py

2011-11-28 Thread Philip Martin
s...@apache.org writes: > Author: stsp > Date: Mon Nov 28 22:34:49 2011 > New Revision: 1207663 > +def patch_target_no_eol_at_eof(sbox): > + "patch target with no eol at eof" > + > + sbox.build() > + wc_dir = sbox.wc_dir > + > + patch_file_path = make_patch_path(sbox) > + iota_path = os.path

svn_delta_path_driver(), its purpose and future

2011-11-28 Thread Hyrum K Wright
In working on the Ev2 shims, I discovered svn_delta_path_driver(), a nifty little API whose purpose I haven't totally yet discerned. It looks to be some kind of hybridization of the editor, allowing a caller to handle some portion of the editor drive manually, though the documentation has enough if

Re: [RFC] Altering copyfrom information in repository

2011-11-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 21:37:43 +0100: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16 PM, "Johan Corveleyn" > > wrote: > >> > >> What if we could 'svnadmin (re)load' a single revision $REV in a > >> repository, which woul

Re: [RFC] Altering copyfrom information in repository

2011-11-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > On Sunday, November 27, 2011 11:16 PM, "Johan Corveleyn" > wrote: >> >> What if we could 'svnadmin (re)load' a single revision $REV in a >> repository, which would then automatically fix up everything coming >> after $REV: >> >>   0. Take

Re: [RFC] Altering copyfrom information in repository

2011-11-28 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 22.11.2011 14:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 11/22/2011 02:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:23 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" >>> wrote: Hi all, I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it p

Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions

2011-11-28 Thread Paul Burba
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:41 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be >> committed), but I suppose there is a reason to show it --- namely, that >> if the file has svn:eol-style=LF but the

Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions

2011-11-28 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 11/28/2011 02:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > I can see the rationale for not showing it in status (since it can't be > committed), but I suppose there is a reason to show it --- namely, that > if the file has svn:eol-style=LF but the on-disk file has CRLF line > endings, that might break my build

Re: [Issue 4070] forced update doesn't correct eols of existing obstructions

2011-11-28 Thread Daniel Shahaf
pbu...@tigris.org wrote on Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:54:12 -0800: > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4070 > > > > User pburba changed the following: > > What|Old value |New value > =

Re: [ANN] SubGit Early Access Program Build #789

2011-11-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 24.11.2011 17:52, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > If I can pry a few cycles free, I'll take a glance at it. But the idea > of running parallel subversion and git access to the same upstream > repository makes me very nervous. Why? A git repository isn't all that functionally different from its Subv

Re: [RFC] Altering copyfrom information in repository

2011-11-28 Thread Branko Čibej
On 22.11.2011 14:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 11/22/2011 02:26 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011 12:23 AM, "Johan Corveleyn" >> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm wondering if it would be feasible to (make it possible to) >>> alter/add copyfrom information in an SVN repos

Re: Subversion 1.7.2 next week (Nov. 29)

2011-11-28 Thread Hyrum K Wright
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > It looks like we've merged a number of items to 1.7.x, and that it's time > to cut another release. I'm going to cut a 1.7.2 release early next week, > barring any reasons against doing so. Please nominate and review items in > STATUS by