On Monday, November 14, 2011 8:27 AM, "NormW" wrote:
> Hi,
> Aimed the Open Watcom Compiler at 1.7.1 subversion source and was
> pleasantly surprised how much built on the first go.
>
> The one real blip was that OWC 1.9 (nor a near future release 2.0)
> supports 64-bit switch expressions, and
/home/neels/svnbench/2014-002433
Started at Mon Nov 14 00:24:33 UTC 2011
*Disclaimer:* this tests only file://-URL access on a GNU/Linux VM.
This is intended to measure changes in performance of the local working
copy layer, *only*. These results are *not* generally true for everyone.
Average
Hi,
Aimed the Open Watcom Compiler at 1.7.1 subversion source and was
pleasantly surprised how much built on the first go.
The one real blip was that OWC 1.9 (nor a near future release 2.0)
supports 64-bit switch expressions, and there is one such used in:
.\subversion\libsvn_ra_svn\client.c
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/291641
>
> Note that it's specific to Debian, i.e., it isn't present in upstream libtool.
Thanks, that's useful. Excitingly enough, Philip's test case
passes for me!
That's because I use gold, which uses --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
by default. If I
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:49 +:
> > > Yes. The kwallet and gnome keyring providers are loaded dynamically and
> > > the loader will not look for providers in the right place.
> >
> > Why won't the loa
On 11/11/2011 11:41 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
I think there is general agreement (to the degree of common
sense?) that file and dir externals should behave the same
way.
+1 to that.
I would be fine with keeping current trunk: it changes file
externals' default behavior, s
Jonathan Nieder wrote on Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:32:44 -0600:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> > Why won't the loader look for them in the right place?
> >
> > Is this the ancient Debian libtool issue, or something else?
>
> Could you give a pointer or summary for the ancient Debian libtool
> issue? I
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 13:31:36 +0100:
> If an algorithm can't do this, then a sane version control system
> must flag a conflict and let a human resolve it.
...
> Subversion's merge-tracking, because a cyclic merge will always cause
> spurious conflicts, in the general case.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 06:14:57PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:49 +:
> > Yes. The kwallet and gnome keyring providers are loaded dynamically and
> > the loader will not look for providers in the right place.
>
> Why won't the loader look for
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote on Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 21:34:30 +0100:
> It was suggested to extend the svn:externals syntax, adding a flag
> that marks externals that should behave differently. By now this
> seems to me to be the best way out. What would that look like?
>
>[-rN] [-c] @P
>
>-c =
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Why won't the loader look for them in the right place?
>
> Is this the ancient Debian libtool issue, or something else?
Could you give a pointer or summary for the ancient Debian libtool
issue? I ask because in the past I've filed bugs against libtool and
it seems to have
Hello,
Can you tell me what software Subversion was developed in? I'm trying to
determine the ECCN for this application.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Kate Gariepy
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida
Corporate Procurement
904-905-8348
904-357-8342 (Fax)
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, In
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:49 +:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> > The failure is described in tests.log:
> >
> > START: auth-test
> > svn_tests: E26: svn_auth_get_platform_specific_client_providers
> > should return an array of 5 providers
> > FAIL: lt-
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Sunday, November 06, 2011 9:28 AM, "Daniel Shahaf"
> wrote:
>> I've committed the sqlite3.m4 part in r1198169. The rest looks good
>> too, but I'm going to wait a day or two before committing the remainder,
>> to let people join the conversation if they have feedback.
On Friday, November 11, 2011 6:07 PM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Fri Nov 11 18:07:52 2011
> New Revision: 1201002
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1201002&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix an unitialised memory read identified by valgrind. This occurs
> during merge_tests.py
On Sunday, November 06, 2011 9:28 AM, "Daniel Shahaf"
wrote:
> On Friday, November 04, 2011 1:24 AM, "Jonathan Nieder"
> wrote:
> > [[[
> > Introduce a --enable-sqlite-compatibility-version=X.Y.Z option for
> > ./configure to allow people building Subversion to specify how old the
...
> > +++ s
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 12:55 PM, "Daniel Shahaf"
wrote:
> I'll transform that into an XFail regression test now.
r1201419
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:38 PM, "Fergus Slorach"
wrote:
> Right, it works with svn 1.6. It's 1.7 that doesn't work.
>
> > ./svn-undelete.sh
...
> svn: E29: '/home/fergus/downloads/wc/A/D/H' is not under version control
> and is not part of the commit, yet its child
> '/home/fergus/
Right, it works with svn 1.6. It's 1.7 that doesn't work.
> ./svn-undelete.sh
### Making a Greek Tree for import...
### Done.
### Importing it...
Committed revision 1.
### Done.
### This is where your reproduction recipe goes. ###
D A/D
D A/D/G
D A/D/G/pi
D A/D/
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 11:07 PM, "Fergus Slorach"
wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for the quick response.
>
> Here's the recipe - this works in 1.6 but fails with 1.7
>
> All the best,
>
> fergus
>
Thanks for the script. It appears to work for me using the system's svn 1.6.17:
[[[
da
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the quick response.
Here's the recipe - this works in 1.6 but fails with 1.7
All the best,
fergus
On 11/13/2011 07:03 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Sunday, November 13, 2011 1:31 PM, "Fergus Slorach" wrote:
For 'undelete' in svn, we do the following:
> svn rm bic4
21 matches
Mail list logo
