Re: New warnings from Xcode 4.2's clang

2011-10-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 21:09:22 -0700: > So all in all, svn 1.7.0 comes out pretty good. None of the above > warnings are a bug, even the switch one from a cursory reading. It's > nice to see a compiler warn about these. I like the fact that the compiler includes in its warnin

Re: svn commit: r1183680 - /subversion/site/publish/site-nav.html

2011-10-15 Thread http://183680.bikeshed.com/
Reporting issues ? Greg Stein wrote on Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 23:03:12 -0400: > Not so sure about this one. The issue tracker is also for feature > requests. That's why it is an "issue" tracker rather than "bug" > tracker. > > Features, patches, bugs, to-do items... > > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 16:

New warnings from Xcode 4.2's clang

2011-10-15 Thread Blair Zajac
I upgraded my Xcode to 4.2 following the iOS 5 release and then compiled svn 1.7.0 for MacPorts, which updated this weekend. The new clang compiler generates many more, higher level warnings then I've seen before, which is pretty cool. Definitely worth upgrading your Xcode and switching to cla

Re: svn commit: r1183680 - /subversion/site/publish/site-nav.html

2011-10-15 Thread Greg Stein
Not so sure about this one. The issue tracker is also for feature requests. That's why it is an "issue" tracker rather than "bug" tracker. Features, patches, bugs, to-do items... On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 16:13, wrote: > Author: danielsh > Date: Sat Oct 15 20:13:20 2011 > New Revision: 1183680 >

RE: Assertion Failed: workqueue.c

2011-10-15 Thread Patrick Quirk
> Another question: Did the reporters get here by doing a copy and then > cancelling, or did they perform an upgrade of a copied tree? > (I missed the verification of this on the mailing list. Maybe the current > user problem is in the upgrade/write entries code?) I got into this state by starting

RE: Assertion Failed: workqueue.c

2011-10-15 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com] > Sent: zaterdag 15 oktober 2011 3:29 > To: Patrick Quirk > Cc: Philip Martin; dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Assertion Failed: workqueue.c > > Philip Martin writes: > > > I've raised issue 4035 >

Re: svn commit: r1183603 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_mutex.h libsvn_fs/fs-loader.c libsvn_fs_base/bdb/env.c libsvn_subr/dso.c libsvn_subr/svn_mutex.c tests/libsvn_subr/cache

2011-10-15 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 09:03:08AM -, stef...@apache.org wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Oct 15 09:03:08 2011 > New Revision: 1183603 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183603&view=rev > Log: > Slightly changing the semantics of svn_mutex__init(). If the > enable_mutex parameter

Re: Assertion Failed: workqueue.c

2011-10-15 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > I've raised issue 4035 > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4035 > It looks like it's already fixed on trunk. Some thoughts about incomplete working nodes. Ideally wc-to-wc copy would be a single db transaction, then we could fail the whole copy on nodes