This is the result of svn_client_status_t.repos_root_url not being
filled in unconditionally. That value is taken from svn_wc_status3_t,
which is in turn pulled from a svn_wc__db_info_t, conditionally
populated in subversion/libsvn_wc/status.c:get_repos_root_url_relpath().
In this particular case
On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:26:10AM -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> At the risk of jinxing the proposed Oct. 11 release date for 1.7.0,
> I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0/
>
> These are cut from the same magic rev as 1.7.0-rc4,
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> At the risk of jinxing the proposed Oct. 11 release date for 1.7.0,
> I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0/
>
> These are cut from the same magic rev as 1.7.0-rc4, meaning t
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 11:26 -0500, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> [...] I'm posting the proposed tarballs for signing and testing:
> http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0/
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix).
My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.
Verified:
I have tested
Philip Martin writes:
> So it seems we need one "Created:" line in UnorderedRegexOutput when the
> two timestamps are the same, but two lines when the timestamps differ.
>
> Are we misusing UnorderedRegexOutput? How do we fix the test?
r1179117 tries two regex if one fails.
--
uberSVN: Apache
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 30.09.2011 16:03, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 17:27 +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 17:20, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>>
Yes, please keep the old output (one rev per line) available somehow.
I ha
6 matches
Mail list logo
