Re: svn commit: r1176416 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/JNIUtil.cpp

2011-09-27 Thread Blair Zajac
On Sep 27, 2011, at 7:56 AM, hwri...@apache.org wrote: > Author: hwright > Date: Tue Sep 27 14:56:56 2011 > New Revision: 1176416 > > > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/native/JNIUtil.cpp > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/javahl/nat

Running tests over svn://, without running svnserve?

2011-09-27 Thread Johan Corveleyn
Hi, I'm confused: with win-tests.py, is it necessary to start svnserve yourself, before running the tests with --url=svn://localhost; or does win-tests.py take care of starting and stopping svnserve itself? I just started running the testsuite with --url=svn://localhost. But first I started svnse

1.7.0-rc4 up for signing / testing

2011-09-27 Thread Hyrum K Wright
I've rolled 1.7.0-rc4, what is expected to be the last release candidate, the magic rev is r1176462, and you can find it here: http://people.apache.org/~hwright/svn/1.7.0-rc4/ After testing this on svn.apache.org, I expect the final release to be cut from the same magic revision in a week or two.

Re: 1.7.0-rc4 blocked, pending a third +1 for the r1173425 group in STATUS

2011-09-27 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 09/27/2011 11:58 AM, Paul Burba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM, C. Michael Pilato > wrote: >> I've reviewed this change and voted +1 on it, approving it. > > Thanks for taking a look Mike. > >> However, I'd appreciate it, Paul, if you'd follow up with an "obvious fix" >> type of c

Re: 1.7.0-rc4 blocked, pending a third +1 for the r1173425 group in STATUS

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Burba
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 11:19 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > I've reviewed this change and voted +1 on it, approving it. Thanks for taking a look Mike. > However, I'd appreciate it, Paul, if you'd follow up with an "obvious fix" > type of change (that doesn't require a vote for backport) to repa

Re: 1.7.0-rc4 blocked, pending a third +1 for the r1173425 group in STATUS

2011-09-27 Thread C. Michael Pilato
I've reviewed this change and voted +1 on it, approving it. However, I'd appreciate it, Paul, if you'd follow up with an "obvious fix" type of change (that doesn't require a vote for backport) to repair some sformatting problems introduced by the patch, such as this one: {{{ Index: subversion/lib

1.7.0-rc4 blocked, pending a third +1 for the r1173425 group in STATUS

2011-09-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[just changing the Subject] Paul Burba wrote on Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 09:29:46 -0400: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 14:46:20 -0400: > >> Update: we're still waiting for some more eyes and votes in STATUS on > >> this issue,

Re: Subversion 1.7.0 GO / NO-GO

2011-09-27 Thread Paul Burba
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Hyrum K Wright wrote on Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 14:46:20 -0400: >> Update: we're still waiting for some more eyes and votes in STATUS on >> this issue, though I think Daniel has some additional changes which >> should be included in it. > > I do

Re: svn commit: r1174517 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

2011-09-27 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Paul Burba wrote on Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 20:03:26 -0400: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 1:16 AM, wrote: > > Author: danielsh > > Date: Fri Sep 23 05:16:21 2011 > > New Revision: 1174517 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1174517&view=rev > > Log: > > * STATUS: Re-tweak my vote on the #4013

Re: [BUG] svn info segfaults after svn cp on a restricted permission directory

2011-09-27 Thread Arwin Arni
Also worth noting that the current trunk behaves the same way 1.7.x does. On Sep 27, 2011 11:50 AM, "Arwin Arni" wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here is the issue: > > Repo contains: > > . > `-- A > `-- B > > This was committed by the user 'admin'. > > Authz rules are: > [/] > admin=rw > arwin=rw > [

Re: [BUG] svn info segfaults after svn cp on a restricted permission directory

2011-09-27 Thread Philip Martin
Arwin Arni writes: > I've attached a shell script which will help you reproduce this > easily. Also, I'm in the process of writing a test-case for this, but > I don't know which set of tests it belongs to - authz_tests.py or > copy_tests.py or info_tests.py. Clearly, the authz subsystem is doing