Re: concerns about svn:hold -- was: svn commit: r1159240 - in /subversion/branches/hold/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h include/svn_props.h libsvn_client/commit_util.c libsvn_wc/node.c

2011-08-21 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 19:48, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >>... >> I have taken the occasion to write a comprehensive description of my current >> vision for svn:hold. > > I find the entire concept to be worrisome. All of a sudden, there are > file

Re: [PATCH] get-location-segments.py would work on self-signed ssl servers too

2011-08-21 Thread Prabhu Gnana Sundar
On Thursday 18 August 2011 06:46 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: I tried your patch against https://svn.eu.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/README (which uses a non-self-signed cert, but rather one for which the cert's hostname differs from the URI's hostname), and it didn't seem to work: [[[ ./tools/

Re: svn cross-repo copy loses svn:executable *and* leaves the working dir inconsistent

2011-08-21 Thread Mark Eichin
Huh. http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.ref.svn.c.copy.html actually has a Note: "You can only copy files within a single repository. Subversion does not support cross-repository copying." I guess that means that the bug is that it doesn't check uuids and actually *enforce* this; I'm sure I'm

[svnbench] Revision: 1160086 compiled Aug 22 2011, 00:21:24

2011-08-21 Thread neels
/home/neels/svnbench/20110822-002322 Started at Mon Aug 22 00:23:22 UTC 2011 - Results for dir levels: 5 spread: 5 Timings for 5x5_1.7.x N min max avgoperation (unit is seconds) 6 332.25 342.10 336.50

Re: concerns about svn:hold -- was: svn commit: r1159240 - in /subversion/branches/hold/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h include/svn_props.h libsvn_client/commit_util.c libsvn_wc/node.c

2011-08-21 Thread Gavin Baumanis
Hi Neels, For the time I have been writing this email I have struggled to find a use-case where "I" would use your new feature proposa None the less; I really like the idea. It really isn't changing anything of real substance from the users point of view. * It just simplifies my commit process

Re: concerns about svn:hold -- was: svn commit: r1159240 - in /subversion/branches/hold/subversion: include/private/svn_wc_private.h include/svn_props.h libsvn_client/commit_util.c libsvn_wc/node.c

2011-08-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 19:48, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote: >... > I have taken the occasion to write a comprehensive description of my current > vision for svn:hold. I find the entire concept to be worrisome. All of a sudden, there are files that just don't act right. "Magic" occurs, and only on certa

Re: Assertion in HEAD

2011-08-21 Thread Alan Wood
On 19 Aug 2011 at 19:20, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > This asserts: > > $svn co http://svnbook.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/src/en/book@3805 && cd book > && $svn up > Hi devs, Just tried this on Windows with trunk. Result: Updating '.': ..\..\..\subversion\svn\update-cmd.c:163: (apr_err=175002) ..\..\.