On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 00:49, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Aug 12 20:49:09 2011
> New Revision: 1157246
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1157246&view=rev
> Log:
> When reverting one half of a move, transform the other half into a
> plain addition/copy.
>
I think that reverting part
On 08/12/2011 11:04 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Discussing 'svn info' output:
>>
>> What do you think, for moved-here items, should we rename "Copied From URL"
>> and "Copied From Rev" to "Moved From *"? Leaving "Copied From *" as
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:28:01PM -, ne...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: neels
> Date: Fri Aug 12 23:28:00 2011
> New Revision: 1157292
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1157292&view=rev
> Log:
> Show moved-to and moved-from information in 'svn status'.
Cheers!
Very good. The only nit
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:11:03PM +0200, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Discussing 'svn info' output:
>
> What do you think, for moved-here items, should we rename "Copied From URL"
> and "Copied From Rev" to "Moved From *"? Leaving "Copied From *" as-is will
> be confusing to the average user person..
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> However, clearing move-info if one half is reverted is simpler to
> implement because we don't have to deal with cases where we cannot
> revert the other half without destroying other local changes (e.g. a
> file replacing the delet
On 08/12/2011 12:55 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:33:43AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
Hi stsp,
check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script
that runs all sorts of things. Readi
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
> On Aug 12, 2011, at 9:05 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Fri Aug 12 16:05:15 2011
> > New Revision: 1157172
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1157172&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Make 'svn revert' error
On Aug 12, 2011, at 9:05 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Aug 12 16:05:15 2011
> New Revision: 1157172
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1157172&view=rev
> Log:
> Make 'svn revert' error out if only one side of a move is reverted.
I actually find this useful sometim
Just ran into this bug in Subclipse.
In the JavaHL native code in JNIUtil.h there is this code:
static void throwError(const char *message)
{
raiseThrowable(JAVA_PACKAGE"/JNIError", message);
}
There is a class in the old JavaHL package with this name, but there is no
class in th
On 08/12/2011 10:44 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> How badly does changing this output break "make check"?
Interestingly enough, my 'make check' had *no errors* at all.
Seems like the test fu ignores extraneous lines altogether. Possibly you
already fixed all that when adding the tree conflicts info
On 08/12/2011 01:53 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Yet... we have seen bugs crop up over the past week in a number of
>> other areas (merge? mod_dav_svn? log? fs txns?). We accept those as
>> normal. They're fixed and backported. This is how we
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:33:43AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > > Hi stsp,
> > >
> > > check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script
> > > that runs all sorts of things. Reading its bottom-most output may
> > > suff
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:33:43AM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > Hi stsp,
> >
> > check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script
> > that runs all sorts of things. Reading its bottom-most output may suffice.)
> >
> > I'd prefer printing the pat
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> I committed this API change (below) in the ctypes-python bindings.
> Should I be revving these APIs in some way, to maintain backward
> compatibility, or is this kind of fix considered fair game?
A bit of context. I'm trying to use the Python bindings in order to
write te
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 02:56:28AM +0200, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi stsp,
>
> check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script
> that runs all sorts of things. Reading its bottom-most output may suffice.)
>
> I'd prefer printing the paths relative to the "current worki
Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> Hi stsp,
>
> check this WIP patch out, attached. (I've also appended a wild test script
> that runs all sorts of things. Reading its bottom-most output may suffice.)
>
> I'd prefer printing the paths relative to the "current working dir" instead
> of relative to the WC ro
16 matches
Mail list logo
