Ah, thanks. I was going to remove beta1 at the same time as I removed
alpha3. There wasn't a dependency, I just hadn't gotten around to it.
-Hyrum
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> FYI:
>
> Daniel removed the beta1 files from dist/, and I also cleared them
> from archive.apa
Hey guys,
I've been debugging a make check failure of
Subversion trunk/apr trunk/serf trunk, together with danielsh.
This seems only to occur with FreeBSD:
igalic@beasdix ...ubversion/subversion/tests/libsvn_subr (svn)-[trunk:1149770]
% ./subst_translate-test
subversion/tests/libsvn_subr/subst
FYI:
Daniel removed the beta1 files from dist/, and I also cleared them
from archive.apache.org (since it is not a formal release).
Cheers,
-g
Copied to /dist, it should hit the mirrors by tomorrow evening, and
I'll announce.
Thanks to the quick testers!
-Hyrum
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Boom! Six signatures in 24 hours :-)
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 16:39, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Messag
Boom! Six signatures in 24 hours :-)
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 16:39, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 22 juli 2011 5:41
>> To: Subversion Development
>> Subject: 1.7.0-beta2 up for testing / signing
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hyrum K Wright [mailto:hyrum.wri...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 22 juli 2011 5:41
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: 1.7.0-beta2 up for testing / signing
>
> All,
>
> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
> signing: 1.7.0
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> All,
>
> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
> signing: 1.7.0-beta2. The magic revision is r1149440 (but a known bug
> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file).
> You can find the
Lieven Govaerts wrote on Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 20:50:07 +0200:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Fri Jul 22 18:06:12 2011
> > New Revision: 1149675
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1149675&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add error checking. This manifeste
SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows 7
VS 2008 SP1
Java 1.6
COMPONENTS:
Apache2.2.19
APR 1.4.5
APR-UTIL1.3.12
OpenSSL 1.0.0a
Neon0.29.6
Serf 1.0.0
ZLib 1.2.4
SQLite 3.7.7.1
VERIFIED:
sha1 sum
TESTED:
JavaHL
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:06 PM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Fri Jul 22 18:06:12 2011
> New Revision: 1149675
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1149675&view=rev
> Log:
> Add error checking. This manifested as a segfault and a file descriptor leak
> in svnsync of an ra_serf source t
On 07/21/2011 11:40 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> All,
>
> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
> signing: 1.7.0-beta2. The magic revision is r1149440 (but a known bug
> in the release scripts doesn't include that rev in the header file).
> You can find the tarballs h
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Arwin Arni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While doing a sync up merge to my branch, I noticed some subtree mergeinfo
> being recorded and decided to look into it's validity. I could trace it back
> to r1054277.
>
> In this revision, stefan2 made a copy of libsvn_diff/diff.h as
>
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/squeeze)
Tested:
tarball + local dependencies
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
"make install DESTDIR=..." c
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-21, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
>> signing: 1.7.0-beta2.
>
> +1 to release (Unix).
>
> My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.
>
> Tested:
>
On Thu, 2011-07-21, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The next prerelease from the 1.7.x branch is now up for testing and
> signing: 1.7.0-beta2.
+1 to release (Unix).
My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.
Tested:
[ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]
swig
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:37, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c Thu Jul 21 15:37:21
>> 2011
>>...
>> @@ -8155,8 +8163,8 @@ remove_noop_subtree_ranges(const char *u
>>
>> APR_ARRAY_PUSH(log_targets, const
On 07/22/2011 07:33 AM, phi...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Fri Jul 22 11:33:14 2011
> New Revision: 1149572
[...]
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static char *
> get_username_to_authorize(request_rec *r, authz_svn_config_rec *conf)
> {
>char *username_to_authorize = r->user;
> - if (c
"roderich.sch...@googlemail.com"
writes:
> 16:00:39.66392 +0200
> +++ subversion/mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c2011-07-21
> 16:00:55.006891000 +0200
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
> get_username_to_authorize(request_rec *r, authz_svn_config_rec *conf)
> {
>char *username_to_authorize = r->use
Hi,
if you have an Apache configuration that doesn't request
authentication,
but still uses AuthzForceUsernameCase, this will crash Apache on each
request:
DAV svn
SVNPath /repos/no-auth
AuthzSVNAccessFile /admin/no-auth.txt
AuthzForceUsernameCase lower
(and no "require ..." st
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 12:29:33PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > @@ -1952,9 +1959,9 @@ svn_client_mergeinfo_log(svn_boolean_t f
> >if (finding_merged)
> > {
> >/* Roll all the merged revisions into one rangelist. */
> > - SVN_ERR(svn_rangelist_merge(&master_inheritable_rangel
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Thanks! Could you verify the following patch:
Great, works for me with Apache 2.0.64 and APR 0.9.19.
Cheers, Roderich
Hi,
While doing a sync up merge to my branch, I noticed some subtree
mergeinfo being recorded and decided to look into it's validity. I could
trace it back to r1054277.
In this revision, stefan2 made a copy of libsvn_diff/diff.h as
libsvn_subr/adler32.c, presumably using a 1.5.x client (x <
> -Original Message-
> From: s...@apache.org [mailto:s...@apache.org]
> Sent: vrijdag 22 juli 2011 12:14
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1149543 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/mergeinfo.c
>
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Jul 22 10:13:49 2011
> New
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 06:01, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c Fri Jul 22 10:01:14 2011
>...
> @@ -355,8 +355,10 @@ svn_ra_serf__open(svn_ra_session_t *sess
> serf_sess->pool = svn_pool_create(pool);
> serf_sess->wc_callbacks = callbacks;
> serf_sess->wc_
Philip Martin writes:
> The intention is that renaming the wc.db file makes the working copy a
> 1.7 working copy. At that stage running 'svn cleanup' will finish the
> upgrade.
There is a window between renaming the wc.db file and removing the 1.6
metadata by running the workqueue to completio
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 13:55, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>>
>>> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
>>> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
>>> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 13:55, Philip Martin wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov writes:
>
>> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
>> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
>> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_postupgrade() since it
>> just r
Ivan Zhakov writes:
> It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
> step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
> state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_postupgrade() since it
> just removes .svn for subdirectories inside wcroot?
When we renam
On 21.07.2011 23:33, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 17:26:01 -0400:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 16:35, wrote:
>>> Author: danielsh
>>> Revision: 1149343
>>> Modified property: svn:log
>>>
>>> Modified: svn:log at Thu Jul 21 20:35:02 2011
>>> ---
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts writes:
>
>> when syncing the first ~200 revisions from the asf repository over
>> ra_serf to ra_local, svnsync segfaults when invoking the
>> pre-revprop-change hook of the local target repo.
>>
>> Not really at home in thi
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:33:45 +0300:
> Greg pointed that earlier on IRC. I'm so far at:
>
Updated patch:
[[[
Index: subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
===
--- subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (revision 1149353)
+++ subv
Hi,
It seems that if user cancel svn upgrade operation in post upgrade
step (removing old .svn directories) working will stay in unusable
state. Is it makes sense to make svn_wc__wipe_postupgrade() since it
just removes .svn for subdirectories inside wcroot?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Lieven Govaerts writes:
> when syncing the first ~200 revisions from the asf repository over
> ra_serf to ra_local, svnsync segfaults when invoking the
> pre-revprop-change hook of the local target repo.
>
> Not really at home in this part of the code, so if anyone can point me
> in the right di
Forgot to say: there appears to be a file descriptor leak when syncing
serf->local (but not with serf->svn), and eg setting 'ulimit -n 20'
shortens the wait time until the bug triggers.
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:33:45 +0300:
> Greg pointed that earlier on IRC. I'm so far at:
Greg pointed that earlier on IRC. I'm so far at:
[[[
Index: subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c
===
--- subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (revision 1149353)
+++ subversion/libsvn_subr/io.c (working copy)
@@ -2393,6 +2393,8 @@ handle_child_process_
Hi,
when syncing the first ~200 revisions from the asf repository over
ra_serf to ra_local, svnsync segfaults when invoking the
pre-revprop-change hook of the local target repo.
Not really at home in this part of the code, so if anyone can point me
in the right direction that would be appreciated
36 matches
Mail list logo
