On Thursday 30 June 2011 07:04 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
The problem is that the prototype of ap_log_rerror() in
httpd-2.3.12-beta,
[[[
AP_DECLARE(void) ap_log_rerror(const char *file, int line, int module_index,
int level, apr_status_t status,
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 04:34:10 +0300:
> Jack Repenning wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 17:49:21 -0700:
> > > subversion 编译后出现如下错误
> > > subversion/mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c: In function
> > > ‘log_access_verdict’:
> > > subversion/mod_authz_svn/mod_authz_svn.c:450: 警告：传递参
Thanks, Jack. Our lists run in English, but in this case I see the
problem and I'm moving the conversation to dev@:
Jack Repenning wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 17:49:21 -0700:
> I received this message for moderation to feedb...@tigris.org. My reflex was
> to spam-bin it, but then I realized th
I got the following warning with: svn pdel -R svn:eol-style .
svn: Attempting to delete nonexistent property 'svn:eol-style'
using svn 1.6.17, and exit status 1. I think this should be regarded
as a bug. I've searched with Google and found that this problem is
not new:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/a
r1141292. (See also r1141291.) Thanks!
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 15:58:04 +0530:
> Noorul Islam K M writes:
>
> > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> >
> >> Reads fine.
> >>
> >> I'd like to test this patch (perhaps later this week?).
> >>
> >
> > I tested with short_circuit configur
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 15:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Blair Zajac wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:11:21 -0700:
>> On 06/29/2011 08:22 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
>> >Author: danielsh
>> >Date: Wed Jun 29 15:22:38 2011
>> >New Revision: 1141133
>> >
>> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=114
Blair Zajac wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:11:21 -0700:
> On 06/29/2011 08:22 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
> >Author: danielsh
> >Date: Wed Jun 29 15:22:38 2011
> >New Revision: 1141133
> >
> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141133&view=rev
> >Log:
> >* subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c
>
On 06/29/2011 08:22 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Wed Jun 29 15:22:38 2011
New Revision: 1141133
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1141133&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_subr/sqlite.c
(svn_sqlite__open):
Only enable the workaround when we are compiled again
Julian Foad writes:
>> [SVN\subversion\libsvn_auth_kwallet\kwallet.cpp:203]: (style) Variable 'app'
>> is assigned a value that is never used
>> [SVN\subversion\libsvn_auth_kwallet\kwallet.cpp:273]: (style) Variable 'app'
>> is assigned a value that is never used
>
> I don't really understand the
Philipp Kloke wrote:
> [SVN\subversion\bindings\javahl\native\JNIUtil.h:40] ->
> [SVN\subversion\include\svn_types.h:132]: (style) Struct 'svn_error_t'
> forward declaration unnecessary, already declared
[...]
> [SVN\subversion\include\private\svn_temp_serializer.h:42] ->
> [SVN\subversion\includ
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 06/28/2011 01:37 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> > Hi Julian,
>> >
>> > I hadn't realized using in-out parameters was considered such bad
>> > form.
>>
>> At a minimum, they force an API divergence in
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:16 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 21:47:06 -:
>> > Author: hwright
>> > Date: Tue Jun 28 21:47:06 2011
>> > New Revision: 1140861
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org
Hi Hyrum,
I have run the tool again, and the result file is much smaller now. Good
work!
I attached the remaining issues to this mail.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
From: Hyrum K Wright
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2011 9:38 PM
To: Philipp Kloke
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sta
On 06/29/2011 08:07 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> My question is about this case:
>
> $ svn copy SOURCE TARGET@HEAD
>
> This case falls under the last sentence of point (C) above. Issue #3651
> [3] claims that the 'HEAD' peg should be ignored in this case, and that
> claim is explicitly tested by c
Chris A Mattmann wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 20:54:13 -0700:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Yeah something like this is what I was thinking about with Greg. Like
> >> wouldn't
> >> it be nice if I could define something like:
> >>
> >> property
Julian Foad wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 13:07:01 +0100:
> My question is about this case:
>
> $ svn copy SOURCE TARGET@HEAD
>
> This case falls under the last sentence of point (C) above. Issue #3651
> [3] claims that the 'HEAD' peg should be ignored in this case, and that
> claim is explici
Thanks for the correction. (I missed the "return the array to caller" bit.)
FWIW, my assumption has been that translation from one programming
language to another might not suffice to disconnect the link to the
original (GPL'd) work.
But we're off-topic (and hypothetical) by now.
Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:31:36 -0400:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:24, Hy
Arwin Arni wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 15:49:10 +0530:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2011 09:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >Arwin Arni wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:45:04 +0530:
> >>On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> >>>Stefan Sperling writes:
> >>>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011
Noorul Islam K M wrote on Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 15:43:04 +0530:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
> > Reads fine.
> >
> > I'd like to test this patch (perhaps later this week?).
> >
>
> I tested with short_circuit configuration. I did not see any errors.
>
In these kind of patches when I say "test" I m
I believe we should make 'svn' reject any peg revision specifier on an
argument where it doesn't use one. This is a rather long email to
record some of the details behind my reasoning, and a question mainly
for Stefan Sperling about issue #3651 [3].
First some context.
$ svn cat ^/trunk/readme@1
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 08:37, Arwin Arni wrote:
>...
> check for mixed rev, switched subtrees and local mods and error out if it
> is.
> Initialize the bisect env.
This should be pretty simple. If I recall correctly, there is a wc_db
API that queries this information for the 'svnversion' program
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 11:24, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> [ Haven't read the whole thread yet, quick response only to this sentence ]
>>
>> Peter Samuelson wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:11:45 -0500:
>>> This is why you should read the e
Noorul Islam K M writes:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
>
>> Reads fine.
>>
>> I'd like to test this patch (perhaps later this week?).
>>
>
> I tested with short_circuit configuration. I did not see any errors.
>
>> Would
>> make davautocheck ENVVAR=short_circuit
>> be a better interface?
>>
>
> I
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 09:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Arwin Arni wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 15:45:04 +0530:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:36 PM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
Stefan Sperling writes:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:12:22PM +0530, Arwin Arni wrote:
On Tuesday 28 June 2011 03:01 PM, N
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Reads fine.
>
> I'd like to test this patch (perhaps later this week?).
>
I tested with short_circuit configuration. I did not see any errors.
> Would
> make davautocheck ENVVAR=short_circuit
> be a better interface?
>
I made it this way.
make davautocheck SVN_PATH
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> The code in question is present on the 1.6 branch and we have been
>> releasing it periodically without much problem. The most recent change
>> I can identify appears to be r870104 dated 2008-03-24.
>
> At th
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> The code in question is present on the 1.6 branch and we have been
> releasing it periodically without much problem. The most recent change
> I can identify appears to be r870104 dated 2008-03-24.
At the time (not verified on subsequent rel
On Tue, 2011-06-28, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 01:37 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> > Hi Julian,
> >
> > I hadn't realized using in-out parameters was considered such bad
> > form.
>
> At a minimum, they force an API divergence in our bindings layers. +1 to
> separate and explicit in and
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 02:16 +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> hwri...@apache.org wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 21:47:06 -:
> > Author: hwright
> > Date: Tue Jun 28 21:47:06 2011
> > New Revision: 1140861
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1140861&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * subversion/svnad
Justin Erenkrantz writes:
> I don't expect that the situation has improved since I tossed
> it...but, if others want to maintain it, go for it. But, expect that
> you're going to be spending lots of time (as I did) trying to get
> every edge case of a platform to work.
The code in question is p
31 matches
Mail list logo
