On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:24, wrote:
>>...
>> @@ -250,6 +256,60 @@ def roll_tarballs(base_dir, args):
>> if not dep.have_usable():
>> raise RuntimeError('Cannot find usable %s' % dep.label)
>>
>> + # Make sure CHANGES is
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:38:12PM +0200, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Are you sure? Maybe there are different definitions of how patience
> diff works (it seems to be rather undocumented :-)). I'm not really
> into the details, but from what I've read on this thread on the git
> mailinglist [1], I tho
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:24, wrote:
>...
> @@ -250,6 +256,60 @@ def roll_tarballs(base_dir, args):
> if not dep.have_usable():
> raise RuntimeError('Cannot find usable %s' % dep.label)
>
> + # Make sure CHANGES is sync'd
> + if not branch == 'trunk':
Boy. That's a conv
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Morten Kloster wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
[]
>> Intuitively, I'd say: let's look into patience diff (or a variation
>> thereof), because it's already being used in several (D)VCS'es, so it
>> has already had a lot of exposur
And hit the dev@ list this time...
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:19, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:38, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>...
>>> (here for review; more code to follow...)
>>
>> Interesting patch.
>
> Was hoping you'd have time to look at it. Thanks!
>
>>...
>>> + /* If "pau
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:38 AM, wrote:
>> Author: sbutler
>> Date: Mon Jun 6 09:38:30 2011
>> New Revision: 1132561
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1132561&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make copy_tests.py 102 XFAIL on OS X because APR doesn
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:38 AM, wrote:
> Author: sbutler
> Date: Mon Jun 6 09:38:30 2011
> New Revision: 1132561
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1132561&view=rev
> Log:
> Make copy_tests.py 102 XFAIL on OS X because APR doesn't support
> case-insensitivity on Unix.
>
> * subversion/tes
[Peter Samuelson]
> What I want is much simpler. Given a conflict region, make it smaller
> by removing lines from the top and bottom that do not actually differ.
> Don't eliminate the conflict entirely. My "proposal" does not lose any
> information; by reducing the size of the conflict region
> > While we're on the subject of 'diff wish', my wish is that diff3 could
> > remove lines from the top and bottom of a conflict region that are the
> > same on both "sides". Whether this happens as a natural part of the
> > implementation, or in a post-processing step, I don't care so much.
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: pbu...@apache.org [mailto:pbu...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 16 juni 2011 18:19
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1136524 - /subversion/trunk/tools/client-
> side/svnmucc/svnmucc.c
>
> Author: pburba
> Date: Thu Jun 16 16:19:11 201
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:41 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Paul Burba writes:
>>>
No surprise that your checkouts are faster than mine given you are
using a local mirror. Wha
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Also, has anyone tested this on an NFS-working copy? Or CIFS?
>
> AFAIK, no one is doing any performance testing on NFS or CIFS. I have
> repeatedly invited users to run the benc
On 14 June 2011 10:12, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> Hi Infra!
>
> We received this message from a user earlier today. As it is our
> first release through the Apache mirroring system, I want to ensure
> we're not goofing something up. We're using the standard mirroring
> cgi script, with a template f
On 16.06.2011 12:38, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 02:44 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> GNU diff is a general-purpose diff tool. 'svn diff' is not.
> Then again, we now have 'svn patch' because some platforms "lack" general
> purpose commandline diff/patch tools. And we do already have specifi
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
> Sent: donderdag 16 juni 2011 12:33
> To: Daniel Shahaf
> Cc: Johan Corveleyn; Julian Foad; m.scha...@3s-software.com;
> dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: diff wish
>
> On 16.06.2011 01:14,
Philip Martin writes:
> That's using the sync option on the NFS server. Using async
>
> Checkout using 1.6:
> Elapsed: 73s CPU: 16s
[...]
> Checkout using 1.7
> Elapsed: 180s CPU: 26s
By comparison the same checkout to a local disk takes about 5s elapsed
for both 1.6 and 1.7.
I tried an exp
On 06/15/2011 02:44 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> GNU diff is a general-purpose diff tool. 'svn diff' is not.
Then again, we now have 'svn patch' because some platforms "lack" general
purpose commandline diff/patch tools. And we do already have specific
tweaking options for the internal diff: -u, -b,
On 16.06.2011 01:14, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 14:44:45 +0200:
>> On 15.06.2011 14:11, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
If you have a different definition of "mis-synchronizes", please explain.
>>> No, I don't mean a broken diff. The diff should at all times be
>>
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 13:55 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 13:14, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >> - r1134000 svn_quoprint.h - no change
> >
> > I think we can deprecate all functions in this file.
> > I didn't know this file and a quick check shows that we didn't use
> these function
19 matches
Mail list logo
