On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 02:00, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
>> New Revision: 1099657
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099657&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Combine the changelist modification notification into
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
> New Revision: 1099657
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099657&view=rev
> Log:
> Combine the changelist modification notification into the operation
> itself, so that (in the future) we can make gu
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 21:46, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
>...
> @@ -3594,32 +3601,31 @@ svn_wc__db_op_set_changelist(svn_wc__db_
>...
> + /* ### why we do filter SOME of the changelist notifications? if a row
> + ### is inserted,
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 22:49, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: gstein
>>> Date: Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
>>> New Revision: 1099657
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099657&view=rev
>>> L
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 22:49, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
>> New Revision: 1099657
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099657&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Combine the changelist modification notification into
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:46 PM, wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Thu May 5 01:46:31 2011
> New Revision: 1099657
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099657&view=rev
> Log:
> Combine the changelist modification notification into the operation
> itself, so that (in the future) we can make gu
Julian Foad writes:
>> > It also solves one of the orphaned ACTUAL_NODE problems: if the
>> > conflicted node is within an added tree then deleting the tree and
>> > leaving the ACTUAL_NODE row could result in an ACTUAL_NODE that has no
>> > parents.
>>
>> That would still be a "local delete, in
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:42 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:37, Philip Martin
> wrote:
> > To make the new single-txn delete pass the regression tests I had to
> > make it leave ACTUAL_NODE rows with tree conflicts. This preserved the
> > behaviour of the old per-node delete
Greg Stein writes:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:37, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> To make the new single-txn delete pass the regression tests I had to
>> make it leave ACTUAL_NODE rows with tree conflicts. This preserved the
>> behaviour of the old per-node delete code, but I'm wondering if that is
Philip Martin writes:
>> +@Issue(3870)
>> +@SkipUnless(svntest.main.is_posix_os)
>> +@XFail()
And that should be:
@XFail(svntest.main.is_ra_type_dav_serf)
>> +def fd_leak_sync_from_serf_to_local(sbox):
>> + "FD leak during sync over serf to local"
--
Philip
Arwin Arni writes:
> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py
> ===
> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py (revision 1099373)
> +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py (working copy)
> @@ -155,7 +155,8 @@
>
>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:34, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 08:55, wrote:
>>>...
>>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h Wed May 4 12:55:03 2011
>>> @@ -1215,7 +1215,10 @@ svn_wc__db_op_delete(svn_wc__db_t *db
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:37, Philip Martin wrote:
> To make the new single-txn delete pass the regression tests I had to
> make it leave ACTUAL_NODE rows with tree conflicts. This preserved the
> behaviour of the old per-node delete code, but I'm wondering if that is
> the correct thing to do.
To make the new single-txn delete pass the regression tests I had to
make it leave ACTUAL_NODE rows with tree conflicts. This preserved the
behaviour of the old per-node delete code, but I'm wondering if that is
the correct thing to do. I suspect that the current behaviour is, in
part at least, a
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 08:55, wrote:
>>...
>> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h Wed May 4 12:55:03 2011
>> @@ -1215,7 +1215,10 @@ svn_wc__db_op_delete(svn_wc__db_t *db,
>> /* Make delete notifications for all paths in the del
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 08:55, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.h Wed May 4 12:55:03 2011
> @@ -1215,7 +1215,10 @@ svn_wc__db_op_delete(svn_wc__db_t *db,
> /* Make delete notifications for all paths in the delete list created
> * by deleting LOCAL_ABSPATH.
> *
> -
Hi All,
This patch adds a test to svnsync_tests.py, to showcase issue #3870:
(http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3870)
"File descriptor leaks during svnsync"
Regards,
Arwin Arni
Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnsync_tests.py
==
Does this tool still have any meaning for us? Do the results indicate
any specific remaining work that must be done for 1.7?
$ svn up
Updated to revision 1099439.
$ ./tools/dev/wc-ng/count-progress.py
| libsvn_client | libsvn_wc | Total
---+
Hi, Philip,
> Von: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> "Markus Schaber" writes:
> 1.7 changes the behaviour so that depth more accurately describes the
> nodes to be affected; issue 3851 describes some corner cases in 1.7.
OK, I see. So maybe some of the workaround code I just
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 4 mei 2011 11:33
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1099298 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/serf.c
>
> I assume the se
I assume the server would error if someone removed this check on the
client side?
rhuij...@apache.org wrote on Wed, May 04, 2011 at 00:04:29 -:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed May 4 00:04:29 2011
> New Revision: 1099298
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099298&view=rev
> Log:
> In li
Greg Stein writes:
> How about after r1099145?
Yes, that fixes the valgrind warnings.
--
Philip
22 matches
Mail list logo
