I am using the latest version of svn on trunk compiled for windows. When
executing the following commands:
svn co http://tinyos-main.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/tos/chips/atm128/spi
.
svn up -r5516 .
I get the following error:
Updating '.' ...
svn: E155017: Checksum mismatch while updati
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 00:52 +0200, "Stefan Fuhrmann"
wrote:
> On 13.04.2011 03:14, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: arfrever
> >> Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
> >> New Revision: 1091573
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=109
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the reply and indulging my naive questions...
But I have a few more, please.
If the information is appropriately stored in the repository, and can be
resolved somewhat via doing svn log / text searches;
Why can't a function ;
getTheLastRevisionAndPathThisFileExisted(filenam
On 04/13/2011 06:19 PM, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Apr 13 22:19:09 2011
> New Revision: 1091933
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091933&view=rev
> Log:
> Following up on r1091928 and r841618 (aka r1544), make sure commits are
> performed on the right reposi
Hey Gavin,
That information is only in the repository (on the server). Historical
details of deletions are not stored on the client, so wc-ng is not
going to change anything here.
The only solid way to do this from a client is with 'svn log', like
you stated in your original email. And the algori
Hi Everyone,
Recently @users;
I asked for some help with how to find revision / path of a file that was
previously deleted.
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-04/0135.shtml
In one of the responses, Stefan suggested that I look through this thread;
http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-04/015
On 13.04.2011 03:14, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 04/12/2011 05:11 PM, arfre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: arfrever
Date: Tue Apr 12 21:11:46 2011
New Revision: 1091573
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1091573&view=rev
Log:
Followup to r1090784:
* build.conf
(libsvn_ra.libs): Add libsvn_
On 04/13/2011 03:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Sha
> -Original Message-
> From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl]
> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 16:06
> To: 'Mark Phippard'
> Cc: 'Ryan J Ollos'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: SVN reports that all targets are not part of same working
copy
> when there is an svn:external that poi
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 15:07, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 20:30
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091728 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
>> include/private/svn_w
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 20:30
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1091728 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion:
> include/private/svn_wc_private.h libsvn_client/commit_util.c libsvn_wc/wc-
> quer
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 18:19, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>...
>> Yes, but the statement itself can be attacked if you manually build it. With
>> static text, that is not possible. Attackers cannot alter the semantics in
>> any way.
>
> I guess I'm just dense, because I can't come up with a scenario in
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 06:17, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/commit_util.c Wed Apr 13
> 10:17:21 2011
> @@ -661,29 +661,24 @@ harvest_committables(svn_wc_context_t *w
> {
> apr_hash_t *local_relpath_tokens;
> apr_hash_index_t *hi;
> + apr_pool_t
2011/4/13 Branko Čibej :
> On 13.04.2011 14:04, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 04/13/2011 06:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Are you saying we *do* support running a mixed set of Subversion
>>> libraries (e.g. libsvn_client 1.7.0 + libsvn_wc 1.7.1 + ...)? I was
>>> under the impression we had a poli
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:57, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>
>> "libsvn_ra_serf stabilization": Ivan and others have made progress in this
>> space, and AFAIK the Serf project has made the "new public release of serf
>> which contains the fix for t
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 11:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I'm looking at a number of things right now, trying to get a handle on
> exactly where 1.7 is in its slow trek towards completion. Obviously, we
Thanks, Mike.
>...
> "Externals": This one concerns me. The referenced issue (#3818) implie
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:00, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/merge.c Wed Apr 13 14:00:49 2011
>...
> @@ -10692,8 +10687,7 @@ merge_peg_locked(const char *source,
> /* Determine the working copy target's repository root URL. */
> working_rev.kind = svn_opt_revisio
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 15:24
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: Ryan J Ollos; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN reports that all targets are not part of same working
copy
> when there is an svn:external that p
(just changing the subject for greater visibility)
On 13.04.2011 14:04, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/13/2011 06:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Are you saying we *do* support running a mixed set of Subversion
>> libraries (e.g. libsvn_client 1.7.0 + libsvn_wc 1.7.1 + ...)? I was
>> under the impression we had a policy of "you must upgrade (or dow
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> there is an svn:external that points within the repository
>>
>>
>> I originally reported this issue with TortoiseSVN [1], but we narrowed it
>> down to an issue in Subversion 1.7dev.
>>
>> If I am committing a working copy with modification
On 04/13/2011 06:17 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Are you saying we *do* support running a mixed set of Subversion
> libraries (e.g. libsvn_client 1.7.0 + libsvn_wc 1.7.1 + ...)? I was
> under the impression we had a policy of "you must upgrade (or downgrade)
> the libraries as a complete set, not indi
> On Sat, 2011-03-26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> >From doc string of svn_wc_diff_callbacks4_t:
>>
>> "Note that @a path is a relative path, not just the basename of the
>> path."
>>
>>
>> >From merge_file_added() (which implements
>> svn_wc_diff_callbacks4_t.file_added):
>>
>> SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_diren
On Mon, 2011-04-11, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> > "Remove obliterate code": I think the obliterate code is all tucked away in
> > private functions and such at this point. Is that as far as we plan to take
> > this in 1.7? If not, the purge of this stuff would be som
On Sat, 2011-03-26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >From doc string of svn_wc_diff_callbacks4_t:
>
> "Note that @a path is a relative path, not just the basename of the path."
>
>
> >From merge_file_added() (which implements
> >svn_wc_diff_callbacks4_t.file_added):
>
> SVN_ERR_ASSERT(svn_dirent_is_abs
Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> >> On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > C. Mich
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] On Behalf Of Branko Cibej
> Sent: woensdag 13 april 2011 11:48
> To: Julian Foad
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 1.7 Roadmap Items Evaluation
>
> On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13
On 13.04.2011 11:37, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07,
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:33 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >>> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:19:48 -0400:
> "Remove tem
On 12.04.2011 18:50, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 11:08 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 04/07/2011 08:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:19:48 -0400:
"Remove temp APIs": I would put this at "nice to have". These APIs are
>>>
Greg Stein writes:
> I understand, and would suggest an alternative if I had one right now. I
> feel the same as you about "not that rock, another".
I have an alternative, but I'm not going to claim it's better.
Use sqlite3_create_function to define a function foo that takes two
parameters, a s
31 matches
Mail list logo
