Why does svn_io_file_lock2() have a retry loop?
The reason given in the code is that some consumer of libsvn_fs wants to run
a critical section while holding a lock in each of two FSFS filesystems. In
that case, why isn't the fix just to tell the consumer to, when wanting to
lock N filesystems, t
On 03/28/2011 08:26 AM, neil.win...@bt.com wrote:
> Sorry, but no cigar :( This probably fixes the assertion found by Hyrum,
> but doesn't address the original issue.
To simplify things, I've repurposed issue #3844[1] to track the problem
that Hyrum was solving, and opened a new issue #3847[2] for
On 03/29/2011 04:50 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> This patch needs a second ra session to work properly. (ra_local, ra_neon
> and ra_serf happen to work ok, but the session is busy with a different
> operation here).
>
> See the svnserve failures.
FIXED:
Sendingtrunk/subversion/svnrdump/lo
I thought I did. Sorry will do so now.
You can also click button and request to join the project and edit the
wiki yourself (applies to anyone).
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> Thanks! All results have been ad
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Thanks! All results have been added to the wiki.
Hi Mark,
Can you add my WinXP results as well? (sent 21 hours ago, according to
gmail :-)).
Or do you have enough benchmark data from Windowses for now (I think
they are all 64 bit)?
Cheer
Thanks! All results have been added to the wiki.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:36 AM, vijay wrote:
> On Sunday 27 March 2011 12:21 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>> I would love to see someone do some tests with the WC on local disk vs
>> network mount (1.6 and 1.7). I tried to do it using some vir
On Sunday 27 March 2011 12:21 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
I would love to see someone do some tests with the WC on local disk vs
network mount (1.6 and 1.7). I tried to do it using some virtual
machines I have access to at CollabNet. The problem is that the
connection of these boxes to the NetApp
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 04:03:10PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Here is a patch that attempts to fix issue #3014.
>
> In the issue, Julian suggests that there should be a policy as to when
> svn should and should not report errors on broken pipes.
> I think that would complicate things too much
As you might have seen, the Apache Conference Committee is now accepting
presentation proposals for ApacheCon North America 2011. This year's
conference is being held November 7-11 in Vancouver, Canada. You can read
the official Call for Participation at the Apache blog:
https://blogs.apache.org
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Can anyone reproduce this?
I ran the test results I posted using Serf trunk on a Windows box.
Paul Burba did as well.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I think your benchmarks are going to be more helpful for us to locate
> hotspots and get them fixed. Mark's seem more high-level, for
> policy-making rather than coding.
>From what I can see both are just driving the command line. Main
differ
On 29/03/11 01:33, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 18:51, John Beranek wrote:
>> On 28/03/2011 23:45, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 17:42, John Beranek wrote:
On 25/03/2011 17:33, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been working on a framework for wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
> Sent: dinsdag 29 maart 2011 12:13
> To: neil.win...@bt.com
> Cc: Hyrum K Wright; C. Michael Pilato; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Bug in svnrdump (trunk@1085375) -- malformed dump file with
> multiple prope
Hi,
I have run these tests on ubuntu 10.10 with svn 1.6.12 and svn
1.7.0-dev(r1086476).
Repository access: file://
Attached the results.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru
On Friday 25 March 2011 11:03 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
Hi,
I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
Thanks, r1086537.
Arwin Arni wrote on Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 14:53:00 +0530:
> Hi All,
>
> The minimal serf version that our trunk requires is 0.7.1. However, the
> get-deps.sh script still fetches 0.7.0. Here's a patch to bump this
> version. This makes it easier for first-timers to compile and
I've taken a shot at a regression test in r1086497.
However, I think we may have a larger problem here:
The svn_delta_editor_t API allows change_dir_prop() calls to be
transmitted only after all directory-children of a directory have been
transmitted [1]. How can we generate a dumpfile given th
I'm getting assert failures while testing serf performance. Typically
../src/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c:622: (apr_err=235000)
svn: E235000: In file '../src/subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/update.c' line 622:
assertion failed (! dir->ref_count)
Aborted
or:
svn: E200014: Checksum mismatch for
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
> > I have been working on a framework for writing tests to record
> > performance. I have something good enough to share:
> >
> > https://ctf.open.collab.net/sf/projects/csvn
> >
> >
Forgot to add: this was with the repository via svnserve on localhost.
Johan
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Here is another data point, for my old (t)rusty Windows XP (32-bit)
> this time, on a system with a pretty slow hard disk (5.4k rpm), 1.83
> GHz In
Hi All,
The minimal serf version that our trunk requires is 0.7.1. However, the
get-deps.sh script still fetches 0.7.0. Here's a patch to bump this
version. This makes it easier for first-timers to compile and build
subversion.
Regards,
Arwin Arni
Index: get-deps.sh
===
> -Original Message-
> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
> Sent: vrijdag 25 maart 2011 17:52
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1085464 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/load_editor.c
>
> Author: hwright
> Date: Fri Mar 25 16:52:10 2011
21 matches
Mail list logo
