Re: possible improvement to svn log with "forward" revision range

2011-03-06 Thread Branko Čibej
On 06.03.2011 11:12, Avalon wrote: > Hi, > > i am using the svn log command with a "forward" revision range, e.g. > "-r N:HEAD". > This fails if the requested path has been deleted in HEAD revision. > > When used with "backward" ranges, which are commonly used, e.g. "-r > N:1", the result is ok - e

possible improvement to svn log with "forward" revision range

2011-03-06 Thread Avalon
Hi, i am using the svn log command with a "forward" revision range, e.g. "-r N:HEAD". This fails if the requested path has been deleted in HEAD revision. When used with "backward" ranges, which are commonly used, e.g. "-r N:1", the result is ok - even if the requested path is not present in re

RE: crash during svn blame on windows 64-bit version

2011-03-06 Thread Marc Haesen
Ok, I overlooked the fact that APR_SIZEOF_VOIDP is the same as sizeof(apr_uintptr_t) independent on the correct setting of WIN64 in apr.h Regards, Marc -Original Message- From: eq...@web.de [mailto:eq...@web.de] Sent: zaterdag 5 maart 2011 0:13 To: Marc Haesen Cc: dev@subversion.apach

Re: svn commit: r1076726 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py

2011-03-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
pbu...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 19:09:01 -: > Author: pburba > Date: Thu Mar 3 19:09:01 2011 > New Revision: 1076726 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076726&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/tests/cmdline/log_tests.py > (check_merge_results): Don't assume expected_rev

Re: svn commit: r1069789 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py

2011-03-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
phi...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:59:41 -: > Author: philip > Date: Fri Feb 11 12:59:41 2011 > New Revision: 1069789 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1069789&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py > (revert_non_recusive_after_delete): New test

Re: svn commit: r1078497 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c libsvn_wc/update_editor.c tests/cmdline/update_tests.py

2011-03-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
On IRC, Bert and I were in disagreement as to how 'svn up' should behave in intersection with locally-added trees: whether 'update' should always affect the BASE tree (irrespective of any locally-replaced trees), or whether it should be interpreted as applying to the overlaying tree (i.e., the high

RE: svn commit: r1078497 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c libsvn_wc/update_editor.c tests/cmdline/update_tests.py

2011-03-06 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org] > Sent: zondag 6 maart 2011 16:44 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1078497 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: > libsvn_wc/adm_crawler.c libsvn_wc/update_editor.c > tests/cmdline/update_t

Re: [PATCH] #3807: 'svn up' of a nonexistent child in a copied dir triggers an assertion

2011-03-06 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Committed r1078497.