Daniel Becroft writes:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>>
>> Please find attached patch for issue 3826. All tests pass using 'make
>> check'
>>
>
> Hey Noorul,
>
> I had a quick look at this issue last night. It appears a similar issue
> exists for almost every comman
Daniel Becroft writes:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
>>
>> Please find attached patch for issue 3826. All tests pass using 'make
>> check'
>>
>
> Hey Noorul,
>
> I had a quick look at this issue last night. It appears a similar issue
> exists for almost every comman
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 15:37, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> The Apache Conferences Committee (ConCom) are pleased to announce the 2nd
>> Apache Retreat at Knockree in Ireland, from Friday 13th to Monday 16th May.
>> As some of you may al
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Nick Burch wrote:
> Hi All
>
> The Apache Conferences Committee (ConCom) are pleased to announce the 2nd
> Apache Retreat at Knockree in Ireland, from Friday 13th to Monday 16th May.
> As some of you may already known, your project is taking part in the
> retreat, a
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
>
> Please find attached patch for issue 3826. All tests pass using 'make
> check'
>
Hey Noorul,
I had a quick look at this issue last night. It appears a similar issue
exists for almost every command (I checked 'info', 'status' and 'updat
Please find attached patch for issue 3826. All tests pass using 'make
check'
Log
[[[
Fix for issue 3826. Make svn diff respect absolute paths. Also fix
corresponding test.
* subversion/svn/diff-cmd.c
(svn_cl__diff): Do not convert absolute path into relative one.
* subversion/tests/cmdline
Paul Burba wrote on 03/02/2011 10:10:40 AM:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
> > On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> >> "C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011
01:44:26 PM:
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:44 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>> "C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011 01:44:26 PM:
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in r1028108
>>>
>>> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wro
On 03/02/2011 10:40 AM, kmra...@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011 01:44:26 PM:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in r1028108
>>
>> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wrote:
>> > This also needs a back-port to the 1.6.x branch.
>> >
>>
"C. Michael Pilato" wrote on 01/28/2011 01:44:26 PM:
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix for issue #3789 log -g regression in r1028108
>
> On 01/26/2011 05:59 PM, Kevin Radke wrote:
> > This also needs a back-port to the 1.6.x branch.
> >
> > [[[
> >Fix issue #3789: Correctly ignore missing locations
Hi All,
Thanks for all the feedback.
As Stefan said, yes, this patch was an immense learning experience for
me and I wouldn't trade it for anything else.
All said and done, I hope this is not the end of this patch. It
implements exactly what the issue tracker describes and I think it would
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:50:31 -0500:
>> I also do not see why clients could not use this. Presumably it sends
>> notifications just like merge --dry-run.
>>
>
> svn up -q -r BASE && svn merge --dry-run -r BASE:HEAD ./ .
Thanks Vijay.
Committed your in r1076234.
With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
On 03/02/2011 03:18 PM, vijay wrote:
Attached the patch that uses macro based solution. APLOG_USE_MODULE is
used only in case of HTTPD 2.3.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 12:20 AM, Stefan Spe
On 03/02/2011 07:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Bert Huijben wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:14:24 +0100:
-Original Message-
From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
Please review this and share your thoughts.
I don't think this is the way we should implement this.
Which is precisely w
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 04:17:33PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:14:24 +0100:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
> > > Please review this and share your thoughts.
> >
> > I don't think this is the way we s
Bert Huijben wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 11:14:24 +0100:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
> > Please review this and share your thoughts.
>
> I don't think this is the way we should implement this.
Which is precisely why one should contact the mailin
On Mar 2, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>> Agreed. I'm not a fan of duplicating this functionality (and
>> maintaining them in parallel when they inevitably drift) as pa
Mark Phippard wrote on Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:50:31 -0500:
> I also do not see why clients could not use this. Presumably it sends
> notifications just like merge --dry-run.
>
svn up -q -r BASE && svn merge --dry-run -r BASE:HEAD ./ ./
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:05, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sun Feb 20 07:05:56 2011
> New Revision: 1072519
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1072519&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge all changes (r1068695 - r1072516) from the
> integrate-stream-api-extensions.
>
> These patches add svn_stream
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
>>> Sent: woensdag 2 maart 2011 10:49
>>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Add --dry-ru
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
>> Sent: woensdag 2 maart 2011 10:49
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add --dry-run flag to "svn update" client command
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> In my
Thanks.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> fixed in r1076161
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:04, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Line 564 of wc_db_pdh.c is the culprit.
>>
>> Figuring out a fix...
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:03, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> Somehow, this broke the build.
>>
The encoding is more likely to be a file-wide attribute, therefore it makes
more sense to carry that information in a file property. In the past, I've
been in favor of adding an svn:encoding or svn:charset property; others have
suggested simply using the "; charset=latin1" bit that can be tagged o
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 08:31:01AM +, Neil Bird wrote:
> Around about 01/03/11 17:13, Stefan Sperling typed ...
> >Great! Here's a new version that includes a fix for the lock_tests
> >failures. I'll propose this for backport now. Thanks for providing
> >the initial patch submission for this an
Use svn_stream_from_stringbuf(). That will put the contents of the
file into the stringbuf, which you can access after the cat2() call is
done.
NOTE: be very careful of reading file contents into memory. You really
don't want to try and read a 16 gigabyte file this way.
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Mar 2,
Hi Bert,
I don't think this is the way we should implement this.
This patch adds an if before every operation in the update editor that changes
the working copy. This makes the update editor harder to maintain, while you
really only need a simple editor implementation that notifies its output
> -Original Message-
> From: Arwin Arni [mailto:ar...@collab.net]
> Sent: woensdag 2 maart 2011 10:49
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Add --dry-run flag to "svn update" client command
>
> Hi All,
>
> In my effort to understand the delta editor API, I took it upon myse
fixed in r1076161
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:04, Greg Stein wrote:
> Line 564 of wc_db_pdh.c is the culprit.
>
> Figuring out a fix...
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:03, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Somehow, this broke the build.
>>
>> Investigating...
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:07, wrote:
>>>
Line 564 of wc_db_pdh.c is the culprit.
Figuring out a fix...
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:03, Greg Stein wrote:
> Somehow, this broke the build.
>
> Investigating...
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:07, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Wed Mar 2 03:07:04 2011
>> New Revision: 1076098
>>
>> UR
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: woensdag 2 maart 2011 4:13
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1075984 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
>
> Bert Huijben wrote on Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 23:06:3
Somehow, this broke the build.
Investigating...
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 22:07, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Wed Mar 2 03:07:04 2011
> New Revision: 1076098
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1076098&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db_pdh.c
> (pdh_parse_local_abspath): F
Attached the patch that uses macro based solution. APLOG_USE_MODULE is
used only in case of HTTPD 2.3.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru
On Wednesday 02 March 2011 12:20 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:08:22PM +0530, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On the whole I preferred the mac
Around about 01/03/11 17:13, Stefan Sperling typed ...
Great! Here's a new version that includes a fix for the lock_tests
failures. I'll propose this for backport now. Thanks for providing
the initial patch submission for this and for helping with testing!
Yep, that's the kiddie! Thanks for
Hello.
I need to programmatically get content of a specified revision of
versioned file. I think svn_client_cat2() will do a good job, but the
first parameter, "svn_stream_t* out" puzzles me a bit. I have read
about "streams" in corresponding header file (not a very long reading)
and it seems to b
34 matches
Mail list logo
