Re: svn commit: r1054989 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c

2011-01-04 Thread John Szakmeister
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:31:10PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: >> I am attaching one which fixes the indentation problem. > > Thank you, committed in r1055092. Doh! Should've caught that. Thanks Stefan! -John

Re: How is mixed authentication/anonymous access implemented

2011-01-04 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 01/04/2011 02:57 PM, Avalon wrote: > I now this is a little bit off topic. > But since SVN seems to be the only solution which has this feature, i hope > for any insight from you. > >>> SVN features a mixed authentication/anonymous access (see >>> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serv

Re: How is mixed authentication/anonymous access implemented

2011-01-04 Thread Avalon
I now this is a little bit off topic. But since SVN seems to be the only solution which has this feature, i hope for any insight from you. SVN features a mixed authentication/anonymous access (see http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.httpd.html#svn.serverconfig.httpd.authz.pe

Re: How is mixed authentication/anonymous access implemented

2011-01-04 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 12/28/2010 08:35 AM, Avalon wrote: > Hi, > > SVN features a mixed authentication/anonymous access (see > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.serverconfig.httpd.html#svn.serverconfig.httpd.authz.perdir.ex-3). > > > I want to achieve the same functionality using a PHP script: allow anony

Re: svn commit: r1054989 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c

2011-01-04 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 09:31:10PM +0530, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > I am attaching one which fixes the indentation problem. Thank you, committed in r1055092.

Re: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_diff/ libsvn_fs_base/ libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ libsvn_fs_fs/ libsvn_ra_neon/ libsvn_ra_serf

2011-01-04 Thread Branko Čibej
On 04.01.2011 16:44, Bert Huijben wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] >> Sent: dinsdag 4 januari 2011 16:27 >> To: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in >> /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libs

Re: svn commit: r1054989 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c

2011-01-04 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Philip Martin writes: > jszakmeis...@apache.org writes: > >> Author: jszakmeister >> Date: Tue Jan 4 11:56:18 2011 >> New Revision: 1054989 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054989&view=rev >> Log: >> Fix syntax inconsistency and update comments. >> >> * libsvn_client/locking_commands

Re: [PATCH] Remove redundant member skip_descendants from libsvn_wc/update_editor.c

2011-01-04 Thread Philip Martin
Arwin Arni writes: > In my pursuit to understand libsvn_wc/update_editor.c I came across an > unnecessary member (skip_descendants) in the > dir_baton. skip_descendants and skip_this are being set at the same > time and have identical values at all times. I have removed one of > these (skip_desce

RE: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_diff/ libsvn_fs_base/ libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ libsvn_fs_fs/ libsvn_ra_neon/ libsvn_ra_serf

2011-01-04 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@xbc.nu] > Sent: dinsdag 4 januari 2011 16:27 > To: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in > /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libsvn_client/ > libsvn_diff/ libsvn_fs_base/ libsv

Re: svn commit: r1054989 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/locking_commands.c

2011-01-04 Thread Philip Martin
jszakmeis...@apache.org writes: > Author: jszakmeister > Date: Tue Jan 4 11:56:18 2011 > New Revision: 1054989 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054989&view=rev > Log: > Fix syntax inconsistency and update comments. > > * libsvn_client/locking_commands.c > (organize_lock_targets): Fix

Re: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_diff/ libsvn_fs_base/ libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ libsvn_fs_fs/ libsvn_ra_neon/ libsvn_ra_serf

2011-01-04 Thread Branko Čibej
On 04.01.2011 16:20, Philip Martin wrote: > danie...@apache.org writes: > >> Author: danielsh >> Date: Thu Dec 30 20:13:50 2010 >> New Revision: 1053996 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053996&view=rev >> Log: >> Once and for all, name all our anonymous struct/enum typedefs. >> >> Follo

Re: svn commit: r1053996 [1/2] - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/ include/private/ libsvn_client/ libsvn_diff/ libsvn_fs_base/ libsvn_fs_base/bdb/ libsvn_fs_fs/ libsvn_ra_neon/ libsvn_ra_serf

2011-01-04 Thread Philip Martin
danie...@apache.org writes: > Author: danielsh > Date: Thu Dec 30 20:13:50 2010 > New Revision: 1053996 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1053996&view=rev > Log: > Once and for all, name all our anonymous struct/enum typedefs. > > Follows up on r1040058, and with thanks to Danny Trebbien.

Re: [oss-security] CVE request for subversion

2011-01-04 Thread Hyrum Wright
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: > Hello Kurt, Josh, vendors, > > Josh Bressers wrote: >> >> - Original Message - >>> >>> Unspecified vulnerability in the server component in Apache Subversion >>> 1.6.x before 1.6.15 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of >>> se

Re: [PATCH] Fix syntax inconsistency and update comments.

2011-01-04 Thread Noorul Islam K M
John Szakmeister writes: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > [snip] > >> Just reminding so that someone take a look at this patch. I know this is >> not so important but still wonder why such a trivial patch takes time to >> get reviewed and committed. > > I think everyon

Re: [PATCH] Fix syntax inconsistency and update comments.

2011-01-04 Thread John Szakmeister
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Noorul Islam K M wrote: [snip] > Just reminding so that someone take a look at this patch. I know this is > not so important but still wonder why such a trivial patch takes time to > get reviewed and committed. I think everyone is just getting back into the grind a

Re: [PATCH] Fix syntax inconsistency and update comments.

2011-01-04 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Noorul Islam K M writes: > Noorul Islam K M writes: > >> "Hyrum K. Wright" writes: >> >>> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Noorul Islam K M >>> wrote: >>> Find attached minor patch which makes 'if' syntax consistent and also some comment improvements. Log [