Re: [PATCH] Update the help doc of svnversion

2011-01-02 Thread Gavin Beau Baumanis
Thanks for the update Vijay. I will remove it from my "watch" list. On 03/01/2011, at 5:25 PM, vijay wrote: > On Saturday 01 January 2011 03:10 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote: >> Ping. This patch has received no comments. >> >> > Gavin, > > Julian modified this patch and committed in r1050449

Re: [PATCH] Update the help doc of svnversion

2011-01-02 Thread vijay
On Saturday 01 January 2011 03:10 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote: Ping. This patch has received no comments. Gavin, Julian modified this patch and committed in r1050449. Thanks & Regards, Vijayaguru On 18/12/2010, at 2:45 AM, vijay wrote: Hi, In r877617, Arfrever improved some messages p

Re: [PATCH] Correct documentation for svn_repos_node_editor and friends

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Erik, Thanks for the patch; I committed it with minor changes in r1054513. Daniel Erik Johansson wrote on Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:00:37 +0100: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 21:35, Erik Johansson wrote: > > An attempt to untangle the mess discussed in > > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-12/0258

Re: My take on the diff-optimizations-bytes branch

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann >> wrote: >>> Hi Johan, >>> >>> Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at  how >>> svn blame could be made faster ba

Re: My take on the diff-optimizations-bytes branch

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann > wrote: >> Hi Johan, >> >> Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at  how >> svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in >> your branch. >> >> One night and most

Re: My take on the diff-optimizations-bytes branch

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at  how > svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in > your branch. > > One night and most of the following day later, I think I made it > a few percent faster

Re: svn commit: r1054273 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_error.h include/svn_error_codes.h libsvn_subr/error.c tests/libsvn_subr/error-test.c

2011-01-02 Thread Blair Zajac
On 1/2/11 12:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Blair Zajac wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:51:45 -0800: On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote: Author: danielsh Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011 New Revision: 1054273 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273&view=rev Log: Avoid hard-codin

Re: svn commit: r1054273 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_error.h include/svn_error_codes.h libsvn_subr/error.c tests/libsvn_subr/error-test.c

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Blair Zajac wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:51:45 -0800: > On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: danielsh >> Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011 >> New Revision: 1054273 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273&view=rev >> Log: >> Avoid hard-coding a line number in a C

Re: svn commit: r1054273 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/svn_error.h include/svn_error_codes.h libsvn_subr/error.c tests/libsvn_subr/error-test.c

2011-01-02 Thread Blair Zajac
On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote: Author: danielsh Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011 New Revision: 1054273 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273&view=rev Log: Avoid hard-coding a line number in a C test. * subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h (SVN_ERR_ASSERTION_ONLY_TRACI

Re: -bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:45:02 +0100: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100: > >> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> > Johan, > >> > > >> > I saw your sync merge, so I

Re: -bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100: >> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > Johan, >> > >> > I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild.  When >> > I ran that 'up' with the b

Re: -bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100: > On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Johan, > > > > I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild.  When > > I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't > > appear when I

Re: -bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Johan, > > I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild.  When > I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't > appear when I ran it with a trunk build.  (See attached transcript.) Did you do that w

-bytes branch reports bogus conflict that trunk doesn't

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan, I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't appear when I ran it with a trunk build. (See attached transcript.) Furthermore, the conflict resolution (a) marked all the head of the file as conf

Re: svn commit: r1054286 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On 02.01.2011 16:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn  wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM,  wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sat Jan  1 20:33:22 2011 New Revision: 105428

Re: svn commit: r1054286 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c

2011-01-02 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 02.01.2011 16:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, wrote: Author: stefan2 Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011 New Revision: 1054286 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286&view=rev Log: XDelta calculation is maj

Re: svn commit: r1054286 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Jan  1 20:33:22 2011 > New Revision: 1054286 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286&view=rev > Log: > XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream. > Therefore, speed up string matching code and the r

Re: svn commit: r1054286 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM,   wrote: >> Author: stefan2 >> Date: Sat Jan  1 20:33:22 2011 >> New Revision: 1054286 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286&view=rev >> Log: >> XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_se

Re: svn commit: r1054286 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_delta/xdelta.c

2011-01-02 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, wrote: > Author: stefan2 > Date: Sat Jan  1 20:33:22 2011 > New Revision: 1054286 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286&view=rev > Log: > XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream. > Therefore, speed up string matching code and the r