Eric,
I committed in r1004834 my other tweaks, comments and queries.
- Julian
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 16:54, Julian Foad wrote:
>...
> Earlier today on IRC, Philip and I came to the conclusion that a copy of
> a mixed-rev subtree (at least from BASE) should be all at the *same*
> op_depth.
Right. This is why the original NODES table had copyfrom_rev in it --
to support copi
On Tue, 2010-10-05, e...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: ehu
> Date: Tue Oct 5 19:56:52 2010
> New Revision: 1004792
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004792&view=rev
> Log:
> * notes/wc-ng/nodes: Add more explanation of how the table works.
Excellent! We can much more easily agree and di
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 08:07:52PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:52:46AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=890
..
> However, the patch needs some work. I suppose it has not been synced
> to Subversion trunk yet, so that
[Paul Burba]
> We can certainly proceed with what you have so far (i.e. -cX-Y
> support) and if anybody wants to take up the -cX:Y banner, let them.
r1004727.
Peter
On 10/05/2010 09:53 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> It will only cause problems if the duplicated resource is used beyond the
> pool lifetime of the original. But this definitely is a bug in
> dup_resource(), which claims to do a deep copy of the object without any
> exceptions. I'll fix this in a
On 10/05/2010 04:21 AM, vijayaguru wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a chance to look into the code subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/commit.c.
> There was a portion of code(commit.c:485) in (checkout_resource)
> function that I could not understand in which case it will get executed.
> Please let me know when this
Thanks.
(Gavin: note that this thread can be disregarded from a patch tracking
point of view.)
On 10/05/2010 05:16 AM, prabhugnanasundar wrote:
> Yes Mike... please disregard this patch for now because no point in
> development without any requirement.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Prabhu GS
>
> O
Yes Mike... please disregard this patch for now because no point in
development without any requirement.
Thanks & Regards
Prabhu GS
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:01 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Are you saying, then, that you'd like us to disregard your patch for now?
>
> On 09/29/2010 08:50 AM,
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 01:27, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon Oct 4 21:27:35 2010
> New Revision: 1004438
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004438&view=rev
> Log:
> On the object-model branch:
> Parameterize the pool alloc function to return a buffer of a given type.
> This prevent
Hi,
I had a chance to look into the code subversion/libsvn_ra_neon/commit.c.
There was a portion of code(commit.c:485) in (checkout_resource)
function that I could not understand in which case it will get executed.
Please let me know when this part of code will get exercised.
if (err == NUL
11 matches
Mail list logo
