On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a second iteration of the patch. It now passes make check.
>
> Differences from the previous version are:
> - Support for \r eol-style (\n and \r\n was already ok).
> - The number of prefix_lines is now passed to svn_diff__lc
On 01.10.2010 21:07, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 04:36, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
...
I mean calling convention. Where is the Subversion ABI defined?
subversion/include/
It follows guidelines from:
http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html
With some additional clarifications/note
On 01.10.2010 15:56, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Fuhrmann writes:
You obviously don't have APR threads enabled.
Thanks for finding this. Fixed in r1003430.
I enabled it, but there's still some issue:
subversion/svnadmin/main.c:1892: undefined reference to
`svn_fs_get_cache
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> If we provided an RSS feed for our news items, which would be a good
> idea but yet more work, than we could use something like this to
> easily pull the most recent news items into the homepage:
>
> http://feed2js.org/
>
> Maybe we could jus
On 10/3/10 2:45 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2010-09-29 14:29:26 Stefan Sperling napisał(a):
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:21:26AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 9/28/2010 6:07 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Tue Sep 28 13:07:23 2010
New Revision: 1002151
URL: http:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:03:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, wrote:
>> > Author: stsp
>> > Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
>> > New Revision: 1004003
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&vi
2010-09-29 14:29:26 Stefan Sperling napisał(a):
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:21:26AM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> > On 9/28/2010 6:07 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
> > >Author: stsp
> > >Date: Tue Sep 28 13:07:23 2010
> > >New Revision: 1002151
> > >
> > >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002151&v
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:03:25PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, wrote:
> > Author: stsp
> > Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
> > New Revision: 1004003
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
> > Log:
> > * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 releas
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 13:12, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Sun Oct 3 17:12:19 2010
> New Revision: 1004003
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1004003&view=rev
> Log:
> * site/publish/index.html: Fix 1.6.13 release date, here, too.
> (Why are news items maintained in two separate places
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Adds a public API function, svn_subst_translate_string2(), an extension of
>> svn_subst_translate_string(), that has two, additional output parameters for
>> determining whether re-encoding and/or line ending translation were
>> performed.
>
>
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Sperling writes:
> > Can I get an explicit +1 to commit this? I just want to get as many of
> > Stefan's changes merged in quickly so that there's enough time before
> > the 1.7 release to test them.
> >
> > Technical detail: How do I merge?
>
> cd svn-trunk-working-copy
> svn
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 07:02:01PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> Julian Foad writes:
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > I wondered if it is safe in a long-running Subversion process, like
> > TortoiseSvn or a Linux equivalent.
> >
> > It seems to me that it won't really matter m
Hi Julian,
Julian Foad writes:
> Looks good to me.
>
> I wondered if it is safe in a long-running Subversion process, like
> TortoiseSvn or a Linux equivalent.
>
> It seems to me that it won't really matter much in practice. If someone
> changes their umask and finds that Subversion carries on
Hi Bert,
Bert Huijben writes:
> Do you really need a 'named' file here?
>
> The named file algorithm of svn_io_open_uniquely_named() is very slow
> compared to the 'just get me a temporary file' implemented by
> svn_io_open_unique_file3(). Especially when you need more than a few
> tempfiles w
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:41:42AM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 20:05:54 -:
> > +++ subversion/site/publish/docs/community-guide/releasing.part.html Thu
> > Sep 30 20:05:53 2010
> > @@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ manager.)
> > -
> > +
> > How not to make
> -Original Message-
> From: artag...@apache.org [mailto:artag...@apache.org]
> Sent: zondag 3 oktober 2010 9:05
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r1003924 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/svnrdump/dump_editor.c
>
> Author: artagnon
> Date: Sun Oct 3 07:05:05 20
Strictly from the view of the non-developer and user of SVN;
I have only ever used the ":" for specifying a range.
But I do see the sanity in having the input match the output too.
If the ability to support both is indeed trivial - and if both cases are
"expected" by users - then that would certai
17 matches
Mail list logo
