Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 20:42:55 +0200:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 04:51:15PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:05:15 -:
> > > Author: stsp
> > > Date: Wed Sep 15 10:05:14 2010
> > > New Revision: 997249
> > >
> > > URL: http:
Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 21:40:16 +0200:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 21:18:26 +0200:
> > > On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:49:06PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > > Right. The issue seems to be "
Greg Stein wrote on Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 00:59:59 -0400:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:35, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Erik Huelsmann wrote on Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 23:20:06 +0200:
> >> Yesterday, I was talking to CMike about our long-standing issue with UTF-8
> >> strings designating a certain path no
Erik Huelsmann writes:
> However, the UPDATE_RECURSIVE_BASE_REPO query doesn't take any of that into
> account and simply rewrites all repo_ids to be the new repo to relocate to.
> That doesn't seem correct though: if other nodes had different repository
> sources, those should probably be exclud
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Philip Martin <
> philip.mar...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Erik Huelsmann writes:
>>
>> > We're now back to a single failure. It's in the relocation-verification
>> code
>> > in db-test.c (li
LS,
Please advise if this is a bug, or a known feature. I have a local
checkout on which I can execute svn commands. However, there seems to
be some inconsistency in the exitcode of the client.
`svn ls repository/non-existing` exits with status 1, and so does `svn
info repository/non-existing`. H
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Erik Huelsmann writes:
>
> > We're now back to a single failure. It's in the relocation-verification
> code
> > in db-test.c (line 1505). With the half-hour I've spent so far, I wasn't
> > able to locate it, but I have to move to other busi
Erik Huelsmann writes:
> We're now back to a single failure. It's in the relocation-verification code
> in db-test.c (line 1505). With the half-hour I've spent so far, I wasn't
> able to locate it, but I have to move to other business now. Hopefully
> you'll be able to find it.
It's the differen
Hi Philip,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:07 PM, wrote:
> Author: ehu
> Date: Thu Sep 16 20:07:27 2010
> New Revision: 997905
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997905&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix one of two remaining SVN_WC__NODES failures (manifesting itself twice).
>
> * subversion/tests/libsvn_
On 09/15/2010 04:11 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I've committed a bunch of changes for issue #3709 and related situations
> (r996884, r997026, r997457, r997466, r997471, and r997474). I *do* plan to
> propose them for backport to 1.6.x, but that work will have to wait until
> tomorrow. Just le
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:59 PM, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Sep 9 15:59:00 2010
> New Revision: 995478
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=995478&view=rev
> Log:
> On the performance branch:
> Bring up-to-date with trunk.
The performance branch doesn't compile anymore on my machi
"Bert Huijben" writes:
>> +-- STMT_UPDATE_COPYFROM_TO_INHERIT_1
>> +UPDATE NODES SET
>> + repos_id = null,
>> + repos_path = null,
>> + revision = null
>> +WHERE wc_id = ?1 AND local_relpath = ?2
>> + AND op_depth IN (SELECT op_depth FROM nodes
>> + WHERE wc_id = ?1 AND loca
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 19:47
> To: Greg Stein
> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r997403 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16
> -Original Message-
> From: phi...@apache.org [mailto:phi...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 19:25
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r997854 - in
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: wc-queries.sql wc_db.c
>
> Author: philip
> Date: Thu Sep
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:17 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 13:19, wrote:
> >...
> > -- ### A comment on 'repos_id' and 'repos_relpath' says they may be
> > null;
> > - is this true and wanted?
>
> Yes. That meant "use the parent's information, and extend it to
> com
On 09/16/2010 10:24 AM, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
> Follow-up to r965551 on issue #3620: svn add ^/ triggers assertion failure
>
> * subversion/libsvn_client/cleanup.c (svn_client_upgrade): Check that
> path isn't a URL.
r99. Thanks again.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www.collab.net
Today in IRC:
Bert, pburba do you think a sleep for timestamps is needed to
fix patch test 27 on windows?
not sure what else could be the problem
stsp: Not sure, will try to look in a moment
thank you
stsp: Not likely.. On NTFS you don't need to sleep for timestamps
stsp: You need sleeps
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 08:59 AM, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
>> Follow-up to r965551 on issue #3620: svn add ^/ triggers assertion failure
>>
>> * subversion/svn/upgrade-cmd.c
>> (svn_cl__upgrade): Check that target arguments aren't URLs before
>> upgr
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:59 +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > > > + * @since New in 1.7.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +svn_error_t *
> > > > > +svn_cstring_strtoi64(apr_int64_t *n, const char *str,
> > > > > + apr_int6
On 09/16/2010 08:59 AM, Uwe Stuehler wrote:
> Follow-up to r965551 on issue #3620: svn add ^/ triggers assertion failure
>
> * subversion/svn/upgrade-cmd.c
> (svn_cl__upgrade): Check that target arguments aren't URLs before upgrading.
>
> * subversion/tests/cmdline/input_validation_tests.py: Ne
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Looking at the patch(1) man page, it sounds like we don't really need
> to reinvent the wheel here:
Phew! - wheels are complex, and the ones we make too often seem to have
nails sticking out of them.
> patch will choose the file name by performing the following steps
Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 13:29, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Bert, Erik, Greg...
> >
> > I think the schema should not disallow the 'excluded' presence in NODES
> > table where op_depth > 0 (which corresponds roughly to old
> > WORKING_NODE). There are already 'copy' cases where it
This patch adds to the input validation tests a new case to verify that
"svn upgrade" rejects URL arguments (instead of crashing) and changes the
svn_cl__upgrade() routine to make it so. The change in svn_cl__upgrade()
is directly based on Stefan's change to svn_cl__add() in r965551.
I've started
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 12:02
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r997670 - in /subversion/branches/object-model: ./
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
>> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 10:24
>> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: svn commit: r997639 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/
> -Original Message-
> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 12:02
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r997670 - in /subversion/branches/object-model: ./
> subversion/bindings/c++/ subversion/tests/libsvn++/
>
> Au
> -Original Message-
> From: hwri...@apache.org [mailto:hwri...@apache.org]
> Sent: donderdag 16 september 2010 10:24
> To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r997639 -
> /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
>
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Sep 16 08:23:54 2
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:23, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Thu Sep 16 08:23:54 2010
>> New Revision: 997639
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997639&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Attempt to centralize and improve our API documentation,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 04:23, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Sep 16 08:23:54 2010
> New Revision: 997639
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997639&view=rev
> Log:
> Attempt to centralize and improve our API documentation, starting with the
> client library. See mailing list thread
29 matches
Mail list logo
